Group Photo of LATIN 1992

So far, we have the following:

  1. Paulo Feofiloff
  2. Fabrício B. Cabral
  3. Christiane Frougny
  4. Ricardo Baeza-Yates
  5. Martín Matamala
  7. José Rolim?
  8. Kosaburo Hashiguchi
  9. Hitoshi Suzuki?
  10. Walter Cunto
  11. Katia Guimarães
  12. Arnaldo Moura
  13. Tomasz Kowaltowski
  14. Pedro Rezende
  15. Takao Nishizeki
  16. Jean-Éric Pin
  17. Daniel Sleator
  18. Daniel Panario
  19. Cristina G. Fernandes
  20. Stephen Kassner
  21. Eric Goles
  22. Marcos Euzébio
  23. Oscar Garrido?
  24. Yoshiko Wakabayashi
  25. Anne Brüggemann-Klein
  26. Aldo de Luca
  27. Véronique Bruyère
  28. Sulamita Klein
  29. Hal Sudborough?
  30. Andrea Richa
  31. Carmen Ortiz?
  32. Ronaldo Hashimoto
  33. Nívio Ziviani
  34. Herbert Baier Saip
  35. Manuel Blum
  36. Felipe Cucker
  38. Michel Cosnard
  39. Kunio Okuda
  40. Arjen Lenstra
  41. Rolf Niedermeier?
  42. Gene Myers?
  43. Scott A. Mitchell?
  44. Mark Giesbrecht
  45. Arnaldo Mandel
  46. Jacques Sakarovitch
  47. Siang Wun Song
  48. Vaughan Pratt?
  49. Jaime Gutierrez?
  50. Oscar Porto
  51. Marco Dimas Gubitoso
  52. Andrea Zisman
  53. Leônidas Brandão
  54. Jaroslav Opatrny
  55. Afonso Ferreira
  56. Dominique Perrin
  57. Alfredo Goldman
  58. Alair Pereira do lago
  59. Jean-Paul Allouche 
  60. Klaus Wagner
  61. Imre Simon
  62. Nami Kobayashi
  63. Michel Latteux
  64. Jozef Gruska
  65. Yoshiharu Kohayakawa
  66. Tito M. Homem de Melo
  67. Marko Loparic
  68. Yossi Gil

Please help up complete/correct the list above.

7 thoughts on “Group Photo of LATIN 1992”

  3. DP

    I can confirm 28, 30, and 44.

    Was Jean-Paul Allouche at Latin’92? Because #59 must be
    a twin brother… very close.

    Cheers,
    Daniel

    Reply ↓
  5. Jacques Sakarovitch

    I confirm (they have question mark) Frougny, de Luca, Bruyère, Cosnard, Sula Klein. I confirm Allouche, not only he was an invited speaker, but I was at his table for the ‘rodizio’ and we were fantasising about writing a paper about p-q rational functions, which never happened probably because the notion was fueled more by caipirinha than by mathematical background. 🙂
    63 is Michel Latteux.

    Cheers
    JS

    Reply ↓

Leave a Reply to Jacques Sakarovitch Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *