Group Photo of LATIN 1992

So far, we have the following:

  1. Paulo Feofiloff
  2. Fabrício B. Cabral
  3. Christiane Frougny
  4. Ricardo Baeza-Yates
  5. Martín Matamala
  6. José Rolim?
  7. Kosaburo Hashiguchi
  8. Hitoshi Suzuki?
  9. Walter Cunto
  10. Katia Guimarães
  11. Arnaldo Moura
  12. Tomasz Kowaltowski
  13. Pedro Rezende
  14. Takao Nishizeki
  15. Jean-Éric Pin
  16. Daniel Sleator
  17. Daniel Panario
  18. Cristina G. Fernandes
  19. Stephen Kassner
  20. Eric Goles
  21. Marcos Euzébio
  22. Oscar Garrido?
  23. Yoshiko Wakabayashi
  24. Anne Brüggemann-Klein
  25. Aldo de Luca
  26. Véronique Bruyère
  27. Sulamita Klein
  28. Hal Sudborough?
  29. Andrea Richa
  30. Carmen Ortiz?
  31. Ronaldo Hashimoto
  32. Nívio Ziviani
  33. Herbert Baier Saip
  34. Manuel Blum
  35. Felipe Cucker
  36. Michel Cosnard
  37. Kunio Okuda
  38. Arjen Lenstra
  39. Rolf Niedermeier?
  40. Gene Myers?
  41. Scott A. Mitchell?
  42. Mark Giesbrecht
  43. Arnaldo Mandel
  44. Jacques Sakarovitch
  45. Siang Wun Song
  46. Vaughan Pratt?
  47. Jaime Gutierrez?
  48. Oscar Porto
  49. Marco Dimas Gubitoso
  50. Andrea Zisman
  51. Leônidas Brandão
  52. Jaroslav Opatrny
  53. Afonso Ferreira
  54. Dominique Perrin
  55. Alfredo Goldman
  56. Alair Pereira do lago
  57. Jean-Paul Allouche 
  58. Klaus Wagner
  59. Imre Simon
  60. Nami Kobayashi
  61. Michel Latteux
  62. Jozef Gruska
  63. Yoshiharu Kohayakawa
  64. Tito M. Homem de Melo
  65. Marko Loparic
  66. Yossi Gil

Please help up complete/correct the list above.

7 thoughts on “Group Photo of LATIN 1992

  1. DP

    I can confirm 28, 30, and 44.

    Was Jean-Paul Allouche at Latin’92? Because #59 must be
    a twin brother… very close.

    Cheers,
    Daniel

    Reply
  2. Jacques Sakarovitch

    I confirm (they have question mark) Frougny, de Luca, Bruyère, Cosnard, Sula Klein. I confirm Allouche, not only he was an invited speaker, but I was at his table for the ‘rodizio’ and we were fantasising about writing a paper about p-q rational functions, which never happened probably because the notion was fueled more by caipirinha than by mathematical background. 🙂
    63 is Michel Latteux.

    Cheers
    JS

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *