we
vertex
fixed
Since
The
cardinality
of
on
that
of
to
small
We
since
subsets
Simonovits
argument
clearly
Note
V
most
pairs
is
and
We
be
subgraph
triangles
for
that
extremal
a
most
and
Spencer
edges
Assume
that
To
single
a
is
belong
the
that
that
Lemma
of
random
very
in
for
Then
to
almost
by
at
that
distinct
given
and
we
be
as
of
Suppose
proper
H
if
of
graph
in
and
that
both
graph
let
fixed
of
for
Now
to
Haxell
pick
that
Lemma
as
If
We
is
we
the
edge
they
let
This
Lemma
the
least
for
satisfies
say
too
hold
deletion
connected
Since
look
question
graph
with
s
the
a
Paul
sufficiently
for
probability
an
holds
generate
is
we
our
which
if
Let
graphs
may
that
Thus
almost
the
graphs
that
tripartition
large
H
states
for
of
assume
Comb
that
graph
Eighty
surely
probability
a
Write
all
Simonovits
show
graph
careful
proof
for
those
note
bad
graphs
we
conjecture
above
is
Thus
that
above
for
and
subgraph
large
the
ator
any
Then
forms
that
let
the
the
that
the
is
be
now
this
given
by
most
the
least
an
Instituto
have
unlikely
that
hence
be
subgraph
parameters
for
Lemma
with
S
sets
g
an
the
that
up
we
Lemma
density
write
that
iii
does
bad
that
the
the
we
subset
probability
Outline
and
tomasz
as
long
an
if
describe
with
the
supported
have
a
given
we
Tur
that
Proof
celebrated
uczak
of
every
Thus
regularity
elements
at
us
We
much
satisfying
concerning
extremal
and
adversary
deduce
any
the
the
and
lower
adding
us
applies
set
this
by
Corollary
later
Sometimes
constant
Let
tacitly
large
forbidden
edges
ril
the
of
was
ii
in
this
main
sufficiently
at
probability
the
of
Introduction
Proof
give
estimate
all
Instead
most
The
is
last
Our
For
CNRS
will
in
of
we
large
space
the
Acknowledgements
that
in
somewhat
R
that
regular
observe
pt
and
we
that
every
Lemma
Let
DMS
Theorem
graphs
above
suffices
that
hence
distributed
well
constant
is
and
from
a
not
is
and
such
this
was
copy
we
auxiliary
us
Mat
we
vertex
give
Let
We
observation
values
most
note
in
proving
are
is
all
Conjecture
cardinality
constant
by
the
of
graphs
precise
us
it
and
all
and
let
such
the
simple
put
of
large
and
remainder
which
lemma
true
in
the
chosen
that
ProTeM
result
given
a
that
a
a
to
conditions
is
whenever
Kohayakawa
be
notation
that
edge
introduced
conjecture
of
even
below
of
of
that
There
have
notice
are
Let
Then
we
of
at
In
and
all
and
Therefore
that
Thus
of
length
From
method
form
at
where
usp
Let
follows
number
is
are
at
of
is
probability
that
exists
above
we
fix
pseudo
larger
assume
fixed
implies
we
and
set
vertices
Theorem
us
and
is
that
Also
To
set
theorem
probability
terms
length
way
depends
properties
in
us
version
simple
and
the
convenience
now
that
method
of
number
that
is
To
with
now
We
pick
with
and
which
a
The
to
asymptotic
for
for
are
In
all
of
prove
and
holds
number
graph
The
the
below
shall
At
our
of
is
and
the
large
We
Colloque
with
and
randomly
Moreover
is
may
to
Conjecture
every
statement
that
Let
proof
and
is
here
have
order
number
all
a
at
form
Let
maximum
a
A
tripartite
be
cf
be
this
number
the
This
other
where
Tutte
for
enough
for
of
any
Conjecture
a
and
is
have
of
section
Random
analyse
proceed
Suppose
we
is
be
i
for
p
Y
cliques
independently
before
To
an
absolute
suppose
Note
three
hand
Lemma
of
Most
version
that
In
that
only
vertices
c
graph
above
we
is
this
and
adjacent
in
suffices
is
S
is
of
estimate
give
is
number
is
is
further
CNRS
required
are
to
in
in
with
over
the
where
vertices
than
s
m
check
the
the
every
shall
a
related
for
Assertion
Fournier
results
if
Combinatorics
which
an
vertices
an
since
proof
conjecture
must
only
show
restrict
fact
is
partition
prove
where
and
such
have
may
to
hold
such
let
makes
large
is
Triangles
of
large
have
state
neighbourhood
Since
have
for
the
the
reals
of
quasi
density
large
subgraph
shall
Theorem
than
is
since
if
holds
above
is
Ne
C
that
of
Ruci
uniform
of
are
definition
Studies
copies
than
number
Erd
distributed
that
that
say
easily
This
other
such
to
satisfies
sketch
uniform
Lemma
A
Note
most
graph
is
us
Let
us
every
all
consider
a
Now
and
then
real
and
which
otherwise
visiting
since
of
above
to
set
connected
recall
in
is
and
and
write
for
Then
Our
m
We
probability
some
For
contains
sufficiently
A
partition
in
the
potentially
Let
follows
Acta
ii
then
a
pair
of
that
two
large
omitted
as
result
proves
inequality
at
distinct
wish
now
rodl
make
inequality
of
deviation
vertices
sufficiently
have
have
one
we
such
is
vertices
and
of
have
is
properties
a
the
also
least
as
Using
Let
For
In
not
in
these
over
Lemma
does
the
only
observing
easily
vertices
sequel
poor
conditional
use
of
to
bad
and
We
we
the
holds
and
and
for
may
above
all
lemma
number
is
any
hence
let
family
size
have
in
is
graphs
to
set
probability
is
our
if
London
value
and
in
Lemma
v
vertices
Suppose
A
verify
corollary
let
concerning
been
s
state
state
exists
that
have
Indeed
if
of
completing
because
Let
from
or
and
at
the
be
above
our
with
edi
that
Suppose
by
the
that
estimate
generating
for
for
therefore
a
pivotal
assumption
at
is
for
We
contains
for
to
of
Z
the
to
F
be
of
proceed
similar
adjusting
of
let
completing
proof
are
Since
way
triple
of
that
random
close
at
an
free
to
fixed
Let
and
and
precise
statement
Let
pair
in
standard
above
An
We
when
if
our
that
for
now
it
common
and
girth
vectors
to
connected
gives
vertices
side
of
from
we
to
Lemma
onyi
surely
Then
shall
before
and
hypercube
are
in
for
all
is
is
already
forbidding
following
addition
graph
to
let
of
the
of
Suppose
that
that
the
definition
should
pairs
that
its
an
that
Szemer
graph
both
yoshi
Lemma
surely
b
an
is
edi
for
that
is
us
triangles
to
given
although
that
observe
such
to
a
is
Recall
large
Let
collection
graphs
Indeed
this
that
deeper
the
a
we
once
that
Arithmetica
we
take
with
write
the
is
proof
assume
consider
have
any
Let
regular
not
triangle
copies
edge
complete
claim
with
one
we
all
many
allows
generated
Let
then
Assertion
belong
We
are
distribution
may
to
that
of
Ruci
a
the
paragraph
Israel
to
of
classes
of
turn
In
from
We
that
maximum
all
another
and
disjoint
or
a
true
Let
and
graph
check
if
next
Also
all
Kohayakawa
induced
and
Clearly
the
large
put
what
the
a
lemma
Conjecture
generate
is
is
hold
denote
Lemma
is
the
equivalently
all
i
any
Let
set
vertices
direct
above
every
distribution
for
We
Frankl
a
put
copy
Combinatorics
will
inequalities
order
assume
We
Unfortunately
the
set
of
set
inequalities
graphs
the
although
part
into
existence
of
T
that
have
Let
and
now
The
graph
the
this
by
is
be
let
should
then
in
only
least
Lemma
choose
certain
in
graphs
attention
between
given
in
a
forest
fact
with
Moreover
faulty
out
that
of
graph
of
too
let
and
expected
for
Clearly
The
all
with
cardinality
may
odl
M
uniform
describe
any
and
Katona
Graphs
large
all
main
this
emes
Periodica
edges
and
the
and
not
In
vertices
for
this
is
bound
the
and
Let
vertices
sets
have
and
conjecture
as
by
ii
We
we
Here
there
for
for
we
expected
to
suffices
This
reasons
should
note
of
on
the
of
if
is
indebted
is
independent
since
then
Put
a
Lemma
introduce
us
then
unusable
bipartite
is
we
integer
in
since
to
not
check
member
to
we
that
assume
is
graph
connected
is
us
that
Sci
we
follows
is
Recall
Conjecture
Secondary
of
may
superexponential
the
all
subgraph
Suppose
vertices
at
in
induced
size
Poisson
by
in
but
a
an
suppose
vertex
Then
at
course
is
of
Lemmas
We
If
little
Suppose
have
course
Clearly
the
that
poor
notion
the
so
holds
edges
edu
d
any
the
for
have
determined
such
now
each
is
and
and
be
Lemma
be
an
Thus
given
In
R
for
By
is
in
condition
of
set
prove
quasi
conditions
lies
is
iv
concerning
lemma
Our
the
d
graphs
For
Pairs
estimate
London
obtain
graph
Thus
and
now
result
Our
graph
if
a
edges
thus
We
by
and
give
we
no
that
T
has
have
for
bad
contain
and
exist
of
density
following
such
that
Now
tells
two
we
such
and
The
deduce
a
in
have
any
we
for
define
now
set
author
an
satisfy
one
that
of
in
by
as
that
lemma
the
J
vertices
deterministic
elements
applies
a
such
form
Proof
with
hypergeometric
step
Series
proof
moreover
not
Lemma
let
we
r
that
any
of
that
define
and
upper
two
the
details
of
of
of
above
upper
above
of
is
a
of
uniform
with
by
fixed
at
defined
for
n
graphs
introduce
describe
the
with
last
also
for
case
apply
at
show
containing
theorem
a
of
exists
of
are
graph
edge
cf
Let
result
as
that
show
free
author
fast
more
and
We
is
see
connected
structure
fact
for
Assertion
all
a
that
lemmas
the
in
Turan
indices
Lemma
which
a
path
at
to
is
and
case
In
matching
i
then
an
above
proceed
they
they
where
the
a
all
are
conjecture
generate
in
be
vertices
and
that
uniformly
in
hence
and
probability
we
investigating
that
mean
given
and
set
for
us
that
first
have
least
regularly
Then
when
suitably
of
that
disjoint
above
in
be
given
of
Clearly
we
fix
we
any
describe
be
of
may
vertex
Theorem
In
To
the
as
that
for
of
the
result
statement
Conjecture
uniform
generated
namely
that
us
a
concerned
this
for
the
chosen
and
em
follows
for
fewer
even
most
for
since
Atlanta
bad
Thus
vertex
of
RANDOM
graphs
of
from
pairs
with
use
integers
and
a
simple
let
if
we
sums
Let
and
Claim
proof
condition
is
consequence
precisely
b
this
say
no
of
with
should
Let
with
as
edges
this
Another
fixed
random
pair
concerning
ii
observe
For
Then
by
sets
that
of
and
this
aim
of
preserving
estimate
by
os
argument
to
not
use
the
the
For
are
V
shall
in
Note
be
that
and
if
graph
conditions
to
with
let
if
at
regular
and
that
Observe
Since
Thus
least
Brazil
bounds
Let
may
we
binomial
relation
only
any
be
ex
be
almost
any
given
Unfortunately
in
we
we
have
use
set
the
only
of
Assertion
write
proved
have
write
graphs
of
second
such
results
inducing
The
Conjecture
vertex
with
let
contains
This
of
also
vertices
surely
be
on
free
cf
that
the
prove
where
Math
clearly
known
Lemma
ril
edges
on
Math
with
T
choices
if
the
Lemma
used
Suppose
contradicting
to
as
may
Any
and
all
what
important
the
d
since
and
and
for
as
at
let
and
aim
are
By
Janson
In
an
where
as
shall
of
on
that
probability
above
we
the
in
we
property
The
has
in
equivalently
non
and
that
edges
a
Let
of
of
Matem
such
Theorem
us
respectively
the
proof
the
that
chosen
particular
nski
Let
then
expected
may
tripartition
it
easy
and
two
graphs
may
are
Furthermore
which
fixed
fact
of
copies
partially
c
in
real
that
adjacencies
The
of
result
vertex
of
that
over
defined
all
study
is
edi
choose
notation
is
and
bound
following
Here
if
and
before
S
parameters
Fix
and
conclude
the
most
We
that
admit
edges
say
Here
are
of
in
we
follows
of
as
that
since
that
we
Math
write
edge
edges
the
show
contains
any
we
number
be
weighted
case
we
in
also
family
interested
constant
in
Still
may
Then
number
above
of
with
is
of
we
of
deviation
for
given
sparse
and
Almost
moreover
size
ii
such
following
A
from
constants
odl
an
more
adversary
statement
below
by
and
the
and
p
there
fixed
follows
least
admits
Lemma
as
is
integer
we
cardinality
may
that
we
is
observation
uniformly
following
from
and
tails
now
within
is
shows
the
of
all
follows
is
that
on
edges
Theorem
the
in
our
classes
an
all
density
case
write
between
argument
pair
all
tripartite
Let
standard
graph
the
most
and
the
with
Shearer
and
and
More
is
holds
the
sequel
Let
independent
to
We
ordering
In
all
proof
such
we
least
based
fails
have
summands
matching
Kohayakawa
would
may
pair
it
appearing
Let
Bermond
by
are
empty
tripartite
once
If
the
apply
density
for
is
of
obtain
at
subgraph
hence
Lemma
pair
over
our
Let
on
of
Then
for
depends
meeting
Lemma
GRAPHS
Note
that
From
Let
For
basic
for
not
lemma
conclude
theory
pair
Math
Let
an
des
with
p
and
where
to
Lemma
by
if
with
and
we
say
and
random
Thus
is
property
any
Therefore
however
binomial
triangles
study
is
of
do
Thus
of
Proof
that
our
only
we
subgraph
leave
all
Lemma
that
and
probability
put
is
is
are
and
graphs
we
that
of
Thus
and
a
which
lemmas
appears
b
if
then
the
to
all
least
Finally
cardinality
now
at
area
and
that
pair
random
all
have
deduce
F
then
such
and
Proof
arbitrarily
are
as
that
given
We
that
weighted
This
that
nski
probability
we
For
Suppose
correlated
further
distinct
roughly
Put
clearly
us
let
II
sections
G
our
side
is
process
has
analyse
carefully
a
that
J
be
a
results
Lemmas
some
ask
ii
We
Now
and
estimate
Then
and
of
hence
where
Let
triangles
have
partition
we
Let
let
at
following
properties
that
by
Pozna
pivotal
Lemma
that
by
assume
the
enough
such
where
We
Lemma
The
of
supposed
condition
of
fixed
that
to
connected
such
Supposing
large
creates
ii
cycles
let
of
and
at
In
Erd
therefore
must
estimate
has
graph
write
of
shall
that
do
has
very
have
Put
with
that
depends
now
in
a
of
estimate
small
T
for
most
randomly
we
that
Math
the
Let
that
us
For
of
such
follows
estimate
lower
H
the
property
estimate
our
Section
only
Therefore
and
weighted
that
needed
and
of
size
lemmas
Fix
at
outline
of
be
to
and
C
FAPESP
where
based
and
of
see
shall
We
For
be
Put
the
a
Indeed
these
is
Assertion
of
aim
which
an
the
and
and
if
there
that
Subgraphs
with
large
by
us
every
a
by
and
all
F
the
Frankl
aim
simplicity
Lemma
the
by
with
Szemer
Y
a
in
that
that
a
the
are
graph
of
given
if
London
we
properties
We
induced
Let
vertices
section
for
Put
that
dimensional
and
constants
the
we
a
that
For
We
Combinatorial
S
is
of
with
is
Conjecture
event
probability
with
estimating
tells
concrete
lemma
then
is
constant
a
above
Assertion
possible
that
instance
of
deducing
proof
in
that
to
now
our
positive
write
we
fixed
sequel
this
we
For
a
sets
are
that
for
os
in
need
Proc
In
the
of
some
the
and
least
let
similar
are
any
by
Conditions
Let
the
find
certain
are
then
for
any
about
and
of
but
Soc
and
in
a
choice
note
Proc
that
tripartite
follows
which
any
recalling
the
graphs
least
single
number
E
is
Discrete
ignore
an
where
given
by
not
the
Lemma
an
following
a
with
Babai
of
the
number
and
now
all
number
immediately
There
Lemma
set
on
Let
vertices
proof
Tuza
For
that
next
Paris
Lemma
connected
if
fix
as
as
all
that
be
claimed
equitable
very
with
statement
for
graph
partite
the
if
in
vertices
sets
let
ao
put
as
this
that
in
least
a
following
Ramsey
note
finish
the
lower
on
ind
of
above
for
given
that
Let
graphs
most
Write
the
any
essentially
the
of
Lemma
d
let
whose
section
far
of
an
by
We
above
and
Furthermore
the
containing
generating
have
of
denote
in
have
of
which
to
may
a
a
for
that
that
forced
and
whether
from
and
note
the
elements
theorem
Lemma
close
unusable
Let
obtain
often
say
path
and
We
and
Now
Alon
a
almost
all
Ramsey
Inter
formalise
have
at
most
be
larger
of
in
the
bipartite
Bollob
with
are
relative
next
that
are
on
choose
given
Almost
to
an
the
which
vertices
to
with
and
subgraphs
proof
to
S
with
of
under
indeed
be
holds
subgraph
is
and
that
all
for
be
the
consequence
and
fix
to
why
deduce
and
subgraph
since
of
and
induced
to
almost
is
let
be
with
that
let
definition
have
contained
of
edges
e
we
we
graphs
to
be
ii
subgraphs
ul
little
see
proves
Assertion
that
and
at
by
contradiction
will
tuples
vertices
in
have
with
at
edges
least
over
we
such
Random
a
us
We
the
in
may
the
edu
surely
convenient
a
large
deduce
all
and
that
now
of
that
us
is
and
is
this
We
true
any
of
the
proof
we
an
now
typical
set
follows
of
as
be
all
with
in
key
that
is
all
of
last
cardinality
We
and
holds
arithmetic
prove
and
with
fails
the
of
the
the
least
let
from
Paulo
and
some
subgraph
For
B
where
are
few
assuming
shall
an
that
these
and
our
subgraph
that
enough
be
are
Assertion
Europ
Janson
binomial
condition
integers
vertices
that
for
taken
and
immediate
concerning
the
of
colours
follows
to
that
existence
the
following
one
generate
theorem
of
free
follows
random
no
which
then
Assertion
Math
and
if
the
element
is
A
connected
graph
degree
Kohayakawa
p
as
graphs
may
Soc
Math
following
on
The
simplicity
quasi
p
and
lemma
any
a
asymptotic
Let
uniform
V
generate
stands
expectation
and
a
of
we
from
if
two
by
is
Ann
Since
complete
poor
at
for
let
graph
above
sets
on
by
such
By
Erd
that
such
be
this
we
Suppose
we
concludes
fixed
the
for
at
itself
shall
close
this
the
hold
graph
for
below
and
moreover
let
and
tomasz
there
as
Hung
proved
pick
use
G
and
i
given
fixed
much
in
the
note
partition
Soc
relevant
Combinatorics
implies
assume
the
and
may
G
of
which
Trans
with
particular
and
to
by
partially
there
Recall
and
a
Algorithms
that
words
the
to
an
to
as
the
involving
such
aim
The
Theorem
Let
number
Then
most
our
vertices
proof
deduce
holds
binomial
poor
by
interest
our
such
probability
every
a
to
than
by
in
now
then
Then
holds
not
is
step
graphs
G
Elementary
is
are
has
have
vertices
bad
the
the
that
clearly
of
we
are
by
that
We
as
proof
such
Consequences
properties
Condition
subgraphs
and
used
Hence
such
is
Clearly
to
letting
We
observe
graph
two
prove
functions
will
complete
for
the
will
given
then
Looking
Lemma
any
as
next
for
for
We
large
to
have
seem
customary
an
of
if
cardinality
suitably
a
and
in
a
set
and
set
common
extra
few
The
maximum
clearly
the
write
random
with
cycle
the
such
this
of
used
generate
sufficiently
large
in
and
trivially
edi
check
Project
is
that
approximation
d
Let
for
shall
progressions
edge
adjacent
Let
is
Let
it
we
be
fewer
that
now
and
partite
know
for
Thus
and
large
that
that
in
vertices
C
each
every
Recall
of
first
be
the
with
any
we
similarly
N
least
any
proof
Lemmas
have
such
that
put
this
distributed
At
Theorem
arbitrarily
of
P
result
upper
is
if
concerning
distinct
have
suppose
Primary
of
for
that
results
also
large
of
for
Lemma
random
does
lemma
satisfies
Tur
most
for
the
us
than
have
and
second
of
us
for
for
the
G
if
the
all
follows
contradiction
balanced
edges
is
Suppose
with
and
is
we
the
Using
and
large
Let
completed
that
generate
proof
not
a
we
claim
almost
what
graph
be
distribution
being
and
for
clearly
Lemma
induced
enough
and
might
trivially
imply
eqno
all
V
that
also
for
Kreuter
densest
joins
proof
For
the
Assertion
random
fixed
do
Also
Let
inequality
large
f
and
density
to
and
bad
the
at
above
be
choice
induced
be
have
triangle
from
speak
equivalent
some
space
the
all
of
and
in
and
see
of
the
such
Lemma
such
proof
for
are
the
the
definition
is
Steger
the
and
following
for
is
graph
holds
in
the
contain
that
such
Let
A
deduce
least
with
we
Note
depends
that
is
Proc
Let
be
main
the
for
in
events
and
Indeed
distinct
results
not
devoted
required
our
with
that
vertex
no
distinct
that
Let
immediate
Lemma
ii
will
then
proof
no
every
any
graph
spare
on
Let
the
constant
to
let
such
next
and
amu
completing
variables
and
the
number
there
iii
contain
us
are
make
Conjecture
have
degree
assume
Y
s
any
then
a
of
conditions
ordering
H
an
in
studied
where
every
Proc
of
vertices
speaking
have
sure
to
the
faulty
of
i
key
the
constant
above
holds
Assume
of
Clearly
assuming
Indeed
main
for
tend
br
finish
with
connected
will
the
is
Vertices
and
vertices
that
of
restated
a
Now
as
disjoint
of
Let
copy
and
of
that
proportion
proof
the
as
vertex
larger
and
the
By
expected
to
Bollob
the
In
under
of
of
is
Our
i
in
Let
condition
exponential
selecting
the
graphs
then
cycles
combining
shall
if
If
see
absolute
as
random
says
we
now
proved
to
and
fixed
independent
of
also
vertex
generate
this
We
an
lemma
probability
of
For
the
Thus
there
that
as
A
is
et
any
parts
number
the
chosen
graph
in
of
there
inequalities
gives
are
At
the
and
and
putting
complete
We
the
Ne
that
induced
the
Choosing
Our
for
The
if
graphs
and
The
to
when
that
Sci
is
contain
usual
hence
summand
let
of
problems
recall
given
a
to
the
last
hence
see
edges
to
the
proof
us
poor
We
bipartite
Let
fact
constants
bad
of
maximal
such
and
of
for
k
may
Note
Stone
fixed
such
may
in
than
piece
an
Then
are
as
an
short
Let
convenience
Soc
We
above
in
from
is
Note
exist
put
observation
and
a
is
tail
Let
simplicity
by
R
For
at
and
neighbourhood
our
ask
may
is
almost
in
in
at
Assertion
sets
a
first
of
Lemma
for
fact
SUBGRAPHS
of
is
of
and
with
D
For
may
given
we
too
In
a
measure
of
em
as
and
write
asz
proof
bound
are
bad
unordered
note
is
spirit
conditioned
in
very
The
Assertion
Assertions
that
described
probability
than
replace
also
os
proof
in
pairwise
that
now
Let
We
in
little
any
Clearly
for
a
partition
which
least
need
partite
in
properties
that
Putting
be
adjacent
To
such
us
by
if
we
matching
necessarily
counting
pick
we
variable
pairs
then
upper
in
a
copies
so
show
be
version
for
Then
would
we
Also
there
Suppose
assertion
and
Lemma
with
Let
graphs
submitted
constant
third
or
the
probability
for
order
as
For
sum
most
in
case
if
to
is
simplicity
In
Mathematics
Cambridge
is
of
an
neighbourhood
us
of
and
we
rest
pairs
Proof
number
for
at
Suppose
have
and
triangle
the
a
claim
we
as
be
almost
graphs
any
an
that
spirit
that
have
follows
section
and
a
the
We
aim
check
most
assume
i
such
following
almost
on
we
expected
this
of
We
are
We
the
If
and
be
bound
For
set
is
now
at
then
these
For
be
within
Thus
for
is
used
random
if
such
P
set
Let
of
too
three
for
our
that
with
proof
connected
in
T
notation
Assertion
to
Proc
p
and
section
Therefore
in
edge
that
and
for
in
any
a
we
Lemma
crucial
event
required
in
or
formulate
are
endvertices
the
in
the
all
show
the
and
the
prove
with
subgraph
recall
auxiliary
choices
any
any
a
a
is
constant
constants
all
partite
if
any
to
are
and
and
a
us
Theorem
Suppose
of
that
Discrete
Also
is
one
take
Pseudo
that
simply
non
For
Now
vertex
the
where
T
will
this
of
are
make
be
Math
next
fails
and
cycle
Soc
now
and
distinct
whenever
as
later
are
problem
which
from
for
free
all
these
than
in
Suppose
of
E
an
odl
universality
we
and
example
if
on
Then
Note
Chung
the
is
any
be
span
J
very
edges
statement
Proc
a
to
now
simple
it
constants
an
least
any
Ajtai
the
are
J
constants
H
for
be
turn
we
refer
the
by
all
write
to
all
bad
in
for
free
holds
iii
note
at
some
in
let
facts
in
an
to
we
independently
and
summand
we
in
Thus
above
for
and
of
density
J
given
is
for
Lemmas
Bull
the
vertex
as
are
of
such
sequence
lemma
Lemma
following
what
of
Ne
connected
which
ranges
edge
satisfies
an
Any
us
we
least
spirit
this
sparser
may
entirely
Finally
in
at
a
Suppose
are
show
hold
follow
Then
and
for
with
and
of
of
use
randomly
Arithmetic
set
Recall
edges
and
odd
some
number
for
suppose
is
with
Thus
Proof
that
Thus
at
adversary
R
Let
completes
holds
the
in
here
for
proof
that
question
is
aim
sufficiently
we
that
graph
which
is
inequality
to
we
on
unexpectedly
is
a
As
have
a
first
we
holds
be
be
x
above
Mickiewicz
short
a
Indeed
Acta
and
Lemma
sufficiently
we
that
assume
was
the
by
It
variant
Note
graph
which
of
positive
have
this
an
quadruples
now
easily
if
R
and
this
Math
and
a
and
introduce
least
graphs
The
Then
we
particular
such
graphs
which
Observe
us
that
by
of
concerns
long
We
given
us
pairs
we
and
let
the
first
else
with
Extremal
distribution
Tur
Clearly
pairwise
variant
satisfies
distribution
we
section
our
number
given
of
also
for
Universidade
this
of
if
a
copy
Let
of
us
Corollary
that
is
there
consider
number
number
Hungar
Section
Theory
from
important
have
is
is
structure
We
Hence
For
a
the
be
we
rest
be
of
each
us
set
a
does
the
Academic
the
is
study
a
that
below
give
Theorem
J
said
Computer
graphs
that
are
that
Forb
us
Vergnas
property
to
of
on
write
and
poor
the
almost
also
Thus
Paulo
the
the
of
of
letting
this
The
at
and
any
Thus
that
S
case
holds
such
of
below
enough
follows
In
ordering
define
colouring
Lemma
the
we
arbitrarily
where
connected
surely
follows
the
state
almost
notation
and
decide
and
follows
almost
subgraph
that
are
small
no
D
to
corollary
d
graphs
in
otherwise
depends
will
complete
Now
split
suffices
for
of
Let
of
bipartition
holds
this
independence
is
in
given
restriction
long
Let
to
edges
many
that
generated
at
We
a
Recall
an
the
set
pair
contains
technical
TeXbook
surely
Z
our
should
deduce
Suppose
of
all
assume
be
describe
S
edge
constant
that
particular
randomly
are
there
Let
be
copy
deduce
the
details
that
hypothesis
Seymour
full
for
r
Corollary
only
union
omit
Related
all
the
We
for
two
Suppose
probability
are
c
Conjecture
concerning
random
least
the
if
of
fixed
once
in
follows
cycle
s
This
the
holds
with
has
with
the
and
Also
Let
may
we
which
choices
Let
Thus
given
as
in
contain
of
be
if
Conjecture
cf
of
interest
and
edu
remark
the
denotes
of
the
we
does
set
appropriate
of
that
corresponds
iii
a
set
probability
Vizing
of
also
adversary
at
of
to
three
graphs
of
Computing
replaced
follows
neighbourhood
consider
if
graphs
and
graph
and
large
the
conditioning
is
given
as
and
probability
that
We
problem
satisfies
that
case
that
us
let
a
obtain
than
the
from
that
all
we
R
for
subgraphs
vertex
London
with
constant
but
these
of
be
the
a
number
concerning
there
and
general
every
number
Theorem
random
results
is
in
hence
may
The
pl
is
d
make
fix
hold
we
are
now
differ
of
out
ril
below
as
claim
remark
too
the
Now
bad
let
in
such
is
Let
free
Combinatorial
vertex
in
of
all
of
any
Simonovits
probability
Ne
of
and
recall
We
Lemma
cardinality
a
set
Let
d
of
is
and
is
lemma
enough
that
triangles
gives
contains
least
the
then
sum
is
Taking
not
handle
of
all
as
pairs
of
O
term
choice
be
speaking
graph
the
by
subgraphs
this
For
we
any
the
and
in
gives
lemma
chosen
Our
sure
J
mean
has
this
will
conditions
of
that
are
for
the
almost
is
assertions
a
edi
a
simply
Put
the
application
matchings
we
Finally
we
that
an
one
our
generate
version
two
with
our
in
author
of
that
make
and
triple
should
density
L
and
at
even
for
Lov
Let
Also
be
Suppose
be
large
with
CC
Ruci
Thus
almost
in
with
cycle
from
an
have
has
pairs
edges
a
puts
it
an
that
be
edges
randomly
Erd
collection
we
for
on
lemma
for
any
of
ask
Lemma
above
from
We
if
one
notation
vertices
any
of
at
s
we
subgraphs
states
all
to
main
above
USA
us
and
Lemma
number
number
close
balanced
is
Amer
then
to
all
and
easily
a
induce
most
contain
and
hence
in
has
binomial
than
Lemma
that
with
claim
in
Hence
most
is
neighbourhood
We
least
in
unusable
copy
is
the
of
inequality
from
where
say
extremely
in
confined
for
A
number
that
said
J
that
a
for
and
at
with
where
is
short
a
is
check
that
of
We
above
that
by
general
show
of
notation
of
have
have
Lemma
Let
a
and
him
then
Tur
and
graph
graph
for
Fortunately
put
for
Here
detail
os
Suppose
our
our
size
partition
given
finish
Combinatorica
and
suffices
fixed
now
lemma
Let
of
and
the
and
same
vertices
course
our
Press
in
which
of
that
degree
R
Lemma
factor
and
be
for
Thus
now
Then
pairs
way
case
is
contradiction
degree
is
as
with
words
of
some
vertex
the
a
with
notice
content
for
on
s
partite
the
necessarily
of
that
above
free
a
plenty
Kohayakawa
Then
of
there
partition
estimate
graphs
that
vertex
lemma
large
as
of
that
sufficiently
of
and
set
a
as
Bull
write
it
is
is
neighbourhoods
For
to
is
is
the
namely
and
Math
If
the
with
proceed
definition
its
random
certain
Now
To
that
with
For
that
A
Thus
E
suppose
section
all
independent
lemma
with
equitable
graphs
Put
proved
which
that
on
section
technical
we
and
of
sequel
that
on
Section
We
the
for
below
any
number
Now
the
vertices
and
by
FREE
randomly
Corollary
is
be
vertex
that
so
may
labelling
parameters
case
and
large
bad
contradicting
of
at
that
connected
view
that
theorem
on
The
some
the
to
we
uniform
to
choose
and
given
an
and
comparing
as
candidates
Emory
the
since
then
is
as
fix
all
as
for
within
this
Amer
too
distributed
fix
for
pseudo
is
that
Let
pairs
at
such
such
may
we
the
contains
general
v
if
application
are
few
of
a
matchings
Then
random
some
of
problem
fixed
deduce
proof
Math
Lemma
and
for
with
lemma
of
P
in
the
similar
indeed
de
a
Science
now
to
hence
set
be
that
there
bad
the
uczak
a
property
pair
and
we
set
and
and
at
vertices
Let
in
following
We
from
an
which
if
implies
hence
are
with
shall
Therefore
A
that
concerning
the
further
we
quantity
with
for
Note
do
a
any
graphs
we
that
or
and
lemma
Assertion
Soc
Lemma
Bollob
or
Thus
do
very
shall
the
the
density
the
graph
furthermore
incident
now
used
similarly
been
stands
far
is
of
inequality
in
probability
large
which
as
Department
Note
refers
set
proceed
that
may
of
from
extended
possible
to
W
and
the
such
saw
models
where
start
given
the
of
The
is
its
complete
and
the
Let
fact
most
while
and
see
we
contains
for
are
both
that
let
shall
M
vertices
an
contains
Since
for
in
of
moreover
for
upper
all
the
as
we
bad
larger
shows
graph
Finally
Lemma
and
is
uniform
we
difficulty
be
that
to
each
density
that
We
for
Rua
constant
write
we
above
the
all
satisfying
of
the
exists
assumptions
edge
Proof
the
value
is
some
upper
and
note
Let
is
condition
we
Thus
no
to
random
result
to
fails
e
necessarily
if
let
constant
we
the
the
ready
was
sparse
ii
follows
set
write
element
L
assertions
Random
of
all
is
let
and
proved
does
a
the
A
our
if
K
see
probability
the
edge
distinct
vertices
have
a
We
to
bound
We
of
Lemma
a
integers
in
for
a
Assertion
is
in
apply
write
graphs
not
proof
indicator
us
small
random
Proc
Suppose
sets
respect
a
not
lemma
Assertion
probability
above
of
in
least
one
SP
put
is
for
partition
that
set
Case
we
by
of
in
asking
edges
span
support
vertices
counting
the
of
same
Lemma
Szemer
integer
Paragraph
that
such
For
approaches
B
and
is
of
any
is
for
let
hold
put
on
that
have
S
we
for
iv
random
considerably
admits
and
let
define
incident
be
vertex
for
then
the
at
For
have
disjoint
and
recall
follows
claim
now
Lemma
the
The
the
adversary
a
and
integers
In
state
at
deduce
following
all
is
Therefore
also
Summing
let
To
nski
with
that
random
fixed
say
large
small
variant
faulty
and
is
that
note
sets
generate
and
first
Lemma
form
graph
A
and
contains
to
solution
in
and
similar
set
the
or
a
a
it
we
arbitrary
claim
by
edges
the
Assertion
the
there
certain
then
most
if
sets
graphs
few
the
estimate
variant
edges
any
stica
is
Finally
A
as
be
graph
equitable
and
this
for
subgraph
used
obtain
edges
random
Proof
our
Amer
J
may
in
It
to
does
any
Lemma
admits
vertex
and
of
of
pair
the
above
if
will
if
i
for
holds
Let
that
Our
that
be
we
assertion
the
and
then
d
subgraph
Babai
that
vertex
Kleitman
an
graph
us
given
The
with
for
of
we
Structures
any
or
we
edges
with
As
from
that
in
two
the
and
have
of
that
and
where
we
span
of
the
where
of
else
and
H
that
graphs
E
to
property
generate
equitable
of
Academic
and
in
since
to
large
it
were
are
a
the
strong
a
the
hypercube
Thus
faulty
is
random
regularity
in
to
J
that
neighbourhood
in
To
deduced
ii
of
is
existence
uredi
of
copy
be
graph
in
with
be
least
Graphs
the
connected
and
isomorphic
are
set
neighbourhood
apply
follows
In
Our
fact
pairs
of
and
Suppose
Therefore
in
partite
attention
adversary
triangles
in
a
say
claims
p
Then
more
Conjecture
with
We
is
from
in
for
as
any
is
graph
statement
at
by
that
has
its
os
Conditions
of
upper
result
Kohayakawa
property
is
sequel
relation
of
for
be
proportion
has
to
simplify
version
We
tripartition
in
subset
For
not
as
thresholds
bound
as
For
Lemma
os
is
edges
us
be
for
to
almost
balanced
if
ask
almost
From
above
is
vertices
all
is
Let
J
deduce
induction
We
contain
Then
the
has
in
certain
for
subgraph
the
sufficiently
which
may
say
uniform
Take
for
we
University
effect
with
now
number
edges
whenever
balanced
graph
us
our
supported
we
such
and
any
lemma
randomly
hence
a
are
enough
inequalities
most
fact
bad
and
and
the
real
in
that
have
all
partite
U
that
precise
edge
such
of
extremal
we
required
L
not
following
the
assume
copies
for
The
following
of
Thus
to
we
In
satisfies
work
the
satisfying
Theory
the
and
From
as
here
have
i
an
that
Las
a
a
moreover
graph
edges
is
is
Relation
need
him
give
vertex
in
us
large
Conjecture
equitable
now
let
with
Let
let
by
assertion
as
from
idea
that
of
for
regular
and
i
plenty
for
for
Cambridge
incident
and
free
also
replaced
and
edges
the
of
consequently
The
vertices
pick
distinct
Preliminaries
assumptions
in
not
concerning
is
in
is
empty
a
of
In
write
probability
we
is
number
of
are
in
and
given
the
no
and
V
by
new
following
provided
is
value
case
graph
Thus
is
that
if
that
Suppose
in
a
large
is
the
estimate
all
at
we
Recall
that
set
Condition
interested
the
say
and
a
Let
Since
see
pair
Result
expected
sum
complete
disjoint
triangles
bad
with
too
and
is
such
is
be
the
For
used
we
a
and
large
is
any
too
in
the
that
unweighted
any
the
be
vertices
Let
a
stands
to
where
graph
and
for
i
by
Lemma
number
as
p
simplicity
be
is
that
then
to
first
such
Notice
Thus
aim
random
J
by
os
into
the
that
or
every
J
determined
of
asymptotic
T
also
of
Random
two
a
the
a
lemma
it
b
Given
invoke
vertex
is
for
contains
note
that
be
all
any
to
of
chosen
subgraph
trivially
Let
Lemma
determine
bound
claim
of
For
applied
to
Lemma
Then
technical
be
where
probability
letting
Lemma
are
and
have
hold
our
endvertices
fixed
upper
Since
such
put
probability
is
subgraph
is
to
of
vertices
taken
first
would
is
an
proving
in
number
whose
In
Let
For
arbitrarily
no
edge
following
Note
let
we
the
Lemma
almost
conditioning
crudely
on
and
where
contributes
the
the
have
let
Lemma
cardinality
where
that
contains
in
may
density
as
Now
our
Assertion
such
even
be
for
edges
is
that
below
graph
be
all
applies
sequel
graphs
a
and
our
Moreover
regular
Recall
ensures
connected
two
with
union
show
is
We
let
with
ingredient
graphs
in
of
to
the
have
we
paragraph
finishes
and
that
most
our
lemma
are
we
say
Now
then
assertion
that
subgraph
for
most
determined
set
and
large
theorem
D
form
from
the
uniformly
that
from
Thus
fixed
little
in
lemma
only
with
all
of
we
now
satisfying
to
deduce
edges
contain
in
grant
all
balanced
for
sum
suitably
regular
shall
Recall
for
negligible
Also
the
at
Suppose
we
aim
of
Tur
Assertion
an
for
at
be
Let
and
number
makes
proof
only
are
graph
restrict
Finally
will
Assertion
set
we
key
the
we
hence
us
We
triangles
We
to
in
at
in
any
and
bound
and
Our
discuss
that
as
edges
sparse
as
show
be
F
two
Thus
that
that
such
below
and
that
In
and
degree
may
for
a
cycles
first
of
as
much
now
last
vertex
Set
Before
relative
if
there
given
of
being
copy
from
as
odl
us
We
pairs
show
graphs
random
copy
is
if
almost
We
of
bounds
now
weak
size
the
all
numerical
graphs
that
and
that
for
of
since
and
is
weights
edge
binomially
class
by
every
all
such
will
assume
the
for
than
is
us
graph
The
would
binomial
inequality
we
as
exists
our
e
enough
a
Amer
disjoint
us
proof
and
which
the
above
for
not
of
path
assertions
any
connected
an
with
and
vertices
should
constants
first
otherwise
to
triangles
graphs
iv
pseudo
e
with
hence
is
a
consists
in
set
is
a
do
Note
sequel
Thus
a
J
our
edi
the
show
with
to
that
from
s
of
the
these
for
Lemma
is
of
adjacent
exceptional
completing
the
We
let
chosen
with
lemma
Let
the
by
fact
and
graph
and
of
right
most
is
does
is
at
an
us
at
poor
on
based
such
is
in
by
given
following
for
this
the
is
iv
assumption
we
edges
that
have
the
arbitrarily
satisfy
to
gives
if
For
the
assume
an
map
is
any
regular
Then
we
that
We
we
Lemma
for
a
sufficiently
write
the
of
L
d
distinct
for
size
we
a
be
NSF
Theorem
in
our
in
To
that
and
and
setting
problems
assume
with
our
by
roughly
least
We
probability
integer
Sometimes
shall
vertices
sequence
assume
much
quasi
a
with
seem
above
and
and
suppose
Note
of
of
of
over
number
least
covered
as
that
with
to
fixed
inequality
sum
choice
have
deviation
for
Put
from
The
are
almost
have
and
we
are
for
smaller
s
graphs
Lemma
for
be
that
Let
in
and
that
we
by
d
edge
for
the
may
all
events
and
subgraphs
now
greater
first
and
we
any
also
Our
and
share
does
surely
they
be
large
suffices
now
far
the
and
forbidding
finally
and
where
need
we
now
given
an
that
is
the
together
prove
be
atica
We
Claim
whenever
a
particular
suppose
Pivotal
to
endvertices
at
that
tripartition
In
os
exists
Suppose
clearly
of
some
this
this
called
have
We
and
lemma
sparse
edges
G
Lemma
of
write
of
all
by
that
connected
set
simple
manuscript
start
if
Thus
subset
set
show
disregard
disjoint
a
exist
odl
in
apply
Series
conclude
and
quadruples
holds
close
put
which
around
Lemmas
of
conclude
of
Lemma
pair
on
of
imply
Suppose
set
with
for
sequel
subgraph
in
for
emory
type
argument
this
random
contains
fixed
Kohayakawa
case
nothing
every
neighbourhood
where
an
use
also
of
see
cycle
We
We
connected
are
if
this
such
and
of
Fix
contained
as
graph
holds
degree
steps
from
of
in
the
Thus
the
as
main
our
version
whose
same
are
is
random
such
the
satisfy
classes
chromatic
and
all
Thus
be
graph
proved
our
connected
to
note
following
may
that
Let
be
Proof
that
of
deduced
spanning
that
let
taken
surely
Lemma
In
choice
from
d
graph
Let
Graphs
equivalence
lemma
bound
our
those
Section
For
key
M
Steger
random
the
Then
estimate
constant
Thus
Therefore
Recall
spanning
since
that
verify
the
large
is
and
os
osa
for
number
whether
Combinatorial
induced
we
proved
density
D
be
a
random
where
order
in
and
Outline
assertion
position
random
the
Lemma
as
as
we
of
below
that
edges
assume
of
is
in
have
and
large
following
of
a
all
of
is
graphs
order
further
of
regular
problem
disjoint
Haxell
subset
are
in
that
Lemma
simple
bipartite
part
triangle
of
first
the
asked
result
which
large
of
with
purposes
is
us
i
assume
and
and
Theory
of
Lemma
as
conclude
in
that
is
random
now
equitable
now
such
several
equitable
that
holds
On
and
result
a
pairs
is
constant
Thus
lemma
We
the
it
finally
with
unbalanced
the
and
is
for
set
part
the
indeed
See
there
required
For
the
triangles
use
method
d
subgraphs
R
We
as
Probability
of
large
made
e
Graham
Then
for
as
at
the
be
most
a
Part
devoted
of
an
holds
of
fact
that
Our
to
as
us
given
In
bad
the
Let
for
were
not
let
edge
use
vertices
pair
Lemma
note
of
To
Gra
simply
that
simplicity
Lemma
if
pairs
on
that
that
of
one
fixed
given
density
the
of
see
as
of
and
We
Janson
as
since
The
probability
results
To
probability
to
our
Our
uniformity
faulty
We
that
given
have
the
at
since
case
upper
a
Assertion
problem
restrict
with
free
upper
graphs
the
suppose
pseudo
amsppt
be
from
a
of
and
instance
Z
least
into
Hence
the
two
write
neighbourhood
precisely
the
at
Hungar
small
into
is
all
in
pair
and
a
a
proof
of
hold
are
shall
unduly
and
The
F
sparse
rest
arbitrarily
is
in
us
following
that
we
that
may
arbitrarily
as
There
and
of
of
We
we
have
Combinatoires
weak
number
results
of
element
do
Lemma
then
that
partition
rest
lemma
To
fail
the
from
us
holds
Kreuter
deduce
the
apply
we
that
vectors
Simonovits
ao
this
next
for
Soc
Note
is
need
we
of
are
have
not
of
may
random
i
less
is
that
the
below
G
the
surely
most
Y
We
least
by
ao
of
of
degree
Case
is
Let
by
are
that
now
uczak
constants
of
number
almost
for
terms
for
we
at
endvertex
aim
have
a
any
that
this
W
iv
of
is
that
vertex
Inequality
with
of
following
Also
We
from
technical
such
belong
random
bipartite
random
poor
Assertions
such
of
concerning
based
we
Studia
and
Now
condition
almost
the
Lemma
then
for
probability
The
Since
adjacent
Condition
the
see
almost
uniformly
may
in
Lemma
us
the
of
the
the
results
We
are
that
Math
of
vertices
vertex
graphs
random
any
bound
subgraphs
we
Main
all
graphs
be
of
vertex
Roughly
completes
Proof
pairwise
Soc
given
and
we
is
Put
be
and
the
concentrate
of
integer
Then
Note
and
and
full
a
remarked
almost
and
that
Our
for
that
where
Let
number
Now
Y
with
as
we
the
size
generate
and
than
that
arbitrarily
Regular
the
fix
most
belongs
pick
from
immediately
the
to
the
say
using
for
any
by
of
the
reference
a
condition
any
of
Consider
is
attention
de
Assertion
proving
for
we
the
which
the
summing
previous
there
most
and
This
piece
graph
v
a
as
assertion
is
unexpectedly
ics
the
for
so
set
edges
in
Thus
be
last
In
it
independent
and
the
show
Theory
vertices
cardinality
above
the
any
obtain
the
number
random
or
furthermore
are
by
to
copy
simple
simple
as
free
section
of
by
joins
a
following
two
a
hence
of
naturally
also
poor
or
free
elements
pair
Let
any
is
Also
put
number
Suppose
we
this
if
connection
that
that
least
probability
for
standard
that
Proof
above
we
Assertion
for
Math
Recall
now
is
P
is
that
of
have
context
a
that
union
directly
in
is
sets
defined
any
a
that
non
of
regularity
and
of
few
a
from
H
maximal
its
sense
fixed
sequel
we
holds
over
regular
that
Szemer
vertices
Suppose
a
U
that
some
say
Lemma
deviations
under
into
contradicting
not
in
our
any
extremal
corollary
that
is
Soc
edges
triple
vertex
us
Finally
equally
we
in
hence
graph
Section
holds
without
vertex
technical
for
respect
version
given
simply
this
that
assuming
by
Szemer
degree
lemma
let
of
in
than
Phil
connected
is
to
J
a
by
the
every
have
connected
that
we
an
between
fix
for
We
edges
holds
edges
Below
if
a
events
it
similar
in
are
phes
for
some
which
unordered
picking
are
argue
not
we
proof
of
now
of
to
coinciding
vertices
P
in
to
and
Lemmas
see
any
in
of
these
its
of
adding
which
with
for
obtain
Lemma
there
the
for
for
if
B
When
copy
adjacent
that
for
in
in
clear
the
sequence
the
only
write
immediate
Then
sparse
in
graphs
The
of
give
let
triangles
almost
the
and
We
in
main
he
that
no
graph
of
is
that
with
Tur
removing
little
and
that
shall
most
of
later
random
if
to
with
and
in
for
in
and
is
Now
of
and
connected
complete
upper
may
condition
is
Lemma
Tur
The
very
assume
we
be
as
We
moreover
the
lemma
ProComb
as
case
Indeed
iii
last
i
of
will
us
of
P
Let
of
that
of
subgraphs
that
and
and
Phil
where
clearly
graph
we
of
ao
Lower
copy
pairs
be
of
situation
question
graph
bad
are
for
follows
with
is
in
is
The
proof
arbitrarily
was
reals
V
Erd
then
whether
that
every
any
Beck
technical
result
Let
edge
very
least
our
Note
most
and
case
vertices
the
and
high
remark
We
regular
conditioned
structural
A
and
Recall
that
depend
collection
a
We
shorter
further
a
triangles
have
with
with
such
respecting
sum
such
our
each
of
of
s
to
Of
J
For
and
for
we
We
Th
least
show
given
number
selecting
of
we
and
pairs
given
fail
that
we
and
last
that
Let
used
need
a
essentially
every
by
be
of
the
generate
and
uredi
that
generate
modulo
all
notation
intersects
induced
conditioned
all
subgraph
for
show
now
at
generating
write
We
we
of
random
that
random
a
have
of
fails
to
regular
classical
a
neighbourhoods
two
Below
and
a
distinct
Erd
also
Let
connected
random
is
we
extremal
almost
is
Theorem
as
for
of
any
of
be
spirit
may
in
from
a
Ramsey
are
theory
in
of
vertex
be
Graph
of
cover
on
let
this
are
either
its
result
be
and
indices
Theorem
have
free
edges
write
of
for
to
that
most
two
number
a
distribution
with
that
to
Fix
where
pairwise
there
the
Lemmas
Theorem
at
that
by
apply
an
the
graphs
and
tending
that
in
have
of
proof
last
and
the
holds
and
before
all
In
where
of
our
let
while
edge
Lemma
common
in
positively
spans
its
Department
by
and
we
above
and
are
for
the
after
is
we
density
of
As
an
deduce
concerning
to
R
Kreuter
Lemma
have
graph
right
to
Corollary
is
have
Koml
we
small
that
that
our
to
is
proof
binomial
write
Corollary
edge
a
prove
the
assertion
for
that
the
edges
main
enough
unbalanced
be
the
is
to
that
such
immediately
that
since
we
that
Spencer
Thus
in
s
Let
to
and
term
four
Section
union
assume
current
Our
the
given
Let
at
whose
holds
Lemma
Lemma
now
and
in
concerning
we
the
which
else
defined
an
vertex
choice
is
inequality
for
Lemma
the
nothing
of
denotes
if
surely
is
For
the
organised
and
from
vertices
than
is
However
if
least
our
for
in
have
of
the
a
from
partition
the
and
we
pairs
poor
say
if
two
Then
for
preliminary
Janson
is
in
The
are
gives
the
apply
we
hence
where
graph
for
H
claim
of
any
check
in
induction
as
that
It
Recalling
used
side
most
eqno
by
os
choice
notation
also
within
Let
random
its
subgraphs
Conjecture
the
Theorem
faulty
Hence
Lemma
set
that
binomial
for
but
the
in
is
If
the
constant
investigates
Our
the
of
A
the
vertices
then
is
few
the
in
surely
then
construct
such
recovers
Comparing
which
with
if
show
have
Lemma
uczak
for
let
Let
proof
a
independent
say
independent
maximal
every
constants
other
that
g
than
more
following
Therefore
the
seen
and
in
cycles
holds
now
claim
that
Also
is
an
large
concerning
probability
the
let
put
Formally
graph
order
the
a
is
or
f
first
below
to
event
is
avoid
shall
holds
of
method
is
from
proof
for
and
real
In
usual
the
pair
graph
of
any
precise
edge
weights
that
endvertices
the
us
assume
not
both
notation
binomial
In
Volume
have
number
let
simpler
Proof
let
p
on
graphs
Section
Assertion
no
few
deletion
and
assume
of
proof
free
introduce
is
expected
where
We
Suppose
elementary
Stone
only
simple
entries
a
we
Lemma
weighted
so
that
let
that
Therefore
Put
of
and
the
proof
in
any
next
some
above
b
us
used
endvertices
we
order
our
should
bigger
since
problem
pairwise
and
edges
at
remedies
have
to
The
that
on
write
For
Lemma
constant
of
using
P
do
edges
the
is
Now
and
we
elements
contradiction
graphs
note
proof
probability
and
Kohayakawa
that
relevant
more
proof
at
distinct
that
of
quite
is
each
the
and
the
Now
In
cardinality
our
for
C
all
Proof
reasonably
and
We
such
and
suitably
and
above
to
is
is
graph
be
that
we
random
particular
Our
first
then
see
proceed
that
us
the
shall
set
our
subgraphs
vertices
such
for
random
the
is
and
say
before
with
lower
strategy
write
The
as
fails
be
belong
such
Most
be
Lemma
in
satisfies
sets
easy
for
pairwise
verify
see
Sotteau
upper
Adam
vertex
in
bipartite
edges
two
not
at
that
such
holds
The
with
iv
put
let
the
tripartite
the
enough
free
is
path
result
a
there
simple
proof
our
v
then
ready
proof
deletions
emory
CNPq
Threshold
pivotal
Conjecture
graph
thus
ordering
plenty
theorem
general
sets
Let
this
the
taken
of
graph
for
bad
of
in
the
which
uczak
Acad
and
the
Using
large
Lemma
with
Proc
uniform
very
vertex
say
copies
to
as
edges
for
let
to
was
of
let
quantity
our
see
present
prove
the
method
such
FAPESP
put
be
suffices
in
it
with
to
note
holds
a
state
This
that
disjoint
be
that
imply
of
of
Math
an
use
ask
long
we
vertices
we
say
and
Our
follows
least
in
almost
is
the
ril
we
if
any
only
we
not
was
stands
probability
are
extremal
odl
all
Let
Suppose
For
write
on
all
the
constant
Conjecture
description
the
small
below
an
sets
Let
Bi
the
of
least
simpler
has
Suppose
we
Proof
of
where
the
A
general
suffices
Suppose
is
that
for
Thus
of
fixed
that
existence
each
The
by
of
constant
suppose
and
also
upper
that
settled
F
between
partition
we
is
technical
be
Paulo
say
to
the
fix
that
triangle
and
Let
trivially
Our
of
all
Theorem
on
it
prove
is
Press
is
symmetry
argument
we
partitions
Proof
conditions
is
a
the
a
for
for
in
lemma
the
small
Discrete
Corollary
two
pair
regular
the
that
reals
nothing
of
that
particular
with
all
there
if
on
follows
almost
free
Bolyai
two
have
by
graphs
the
an
tend
given
Then
of
let
follows
or
Put
thereby
numbers
but
that
since
method
Ramsey
below
for
with
Simonovits
is
is
of
required
finally
join
to
most
choice
consideration
B
We
intersects
have
Thus
and
let
lemma
most
vertices
that
Let
and
all
Math
is
that
proof
is
convenient
graphs
spanned
Put
proof
of
neighbours
vertices
on
poor
that
following
the
we
pairs
for
is
the
are
cases
equitable
is
concepts
and
one
We
graph
hold
set
if
the
hand
then
set
with
is
if
middle
For
on
with
stronger
in
assume
some
are
probability
such
Thus
the
will
any
in
family
a
lemma
on
and
assume
where
us
indicator
for
ii
that
results
non
note
likely
at
of
Ramsey
us
a
C
enough
all
to
is
assume
generating
edges
endvertices
Erd
the
graphs
and
number
have
two
result
colour
Sz
of
i
they
inequality
the
obviously
may
triangles
the
given
be
Zs
poor
satisfying
exist
a
that
it
that
is
does
us
Given
all
let
reading
that
problem
let
least
However
rather
and
with
then
two
condition
be
an
almost
Let
dealing
the
the
there
supported
graphs
present
where
since
section
for
We
graph
S
sets
and
where
set
London
and
we
faulty
Conjecture
clearly
by
Georgia
may
large
are
method
Suppose
are
has
us
For
is
In
graph
J
a
is
distribution
probability
claim
vertices
contains
in
Section
satisfying
are
a
are
independent
defined
that
sets
we
Distribution
to
of
For
be
and
graph
we
event
would
that
Assertion
Preliminaries
expanding
for
are
the
that
by
uczak
By
os
such
is
number
J
on
is
regularity
We
Let
from
large
of
of
vertices
of
study
for
is
size
let
not
graph
use
we
integer
stand
obvious
is
is
Budapest
then
probability
and
graph
all
have
a
almost
Proof
fixed
consider
the
us
most
proved
ii
the
by
and
Similarly
tree
function
Tur
graph
connected
where
all
that
We
we
pair
Deterministic
random
Then
a
holds
small
now
is
convenience
for
as
hence
as
which
adversary
lemma
Conjecture
now
the
d
if
variables
apply
the
proof
such
if
the
below
set
of
that
let
are
Markov
say
with
all
for
it
writing
element
hand
of
d
is
the
a
pair
with
all
which
and
be
density
vertex
that
every
such
implies
of
is
clarity
and
ii
that
raised
vertices
has
for
claimed
each
set
concentrates
question
work
prove
graphs
and
surely
proceed
indirect
that
be
the
above
little
graphs
triangles
we
given
of
where
that
assignment
Let
well
to
there
all
that
which
To
poor
symmetric
in
of
a
forced
Large
vertices
that
so
for
for
over
Since
for
for
a
to
statement
vertex
Lemma
relates
usual
probability
should
simple
and
any
a
claim
contrary
lemma
complete
are
the
of
which
vertices
and
B
in
in
incident
Erd
or
an
graph
fix
condition
of
in
of
OF
of
when
on
our
a
the
in
for
as
Assertion
that
the
an
of
matching
Suppose
above
at
at
not
V
some
forests
For
have
pair
c
in
for
result
splits
have
by
almost
triple
of
Random
estimates
be
Note
for
satisfies
is
proof
of
two
the
apply
edges
Poland
the
element
s
os
bad
well
let
s
a
prove
definitions
edges
vertices
focus
is
hold
replaced
partition
independent
let
the
have
remainder
connected
stands
Section
as
by
We
inequalities
therefore
University
Before
For
cycles
freely
shall
distribution
lemma
in
at
extension
least
check
as
that
graphs
turns
be
vertices
and
that
in
now
Thus
have
which
say
faulty
and
a
for
s
Suppose
a
us
partition
always
with
for
above
for
such
for
that
In
and
is
of
any
may
a
in
an
Lemma
of
now
order
We
of
above
decide
for
our
brief
now
that
be
is
the
of
was
be
least
is
Put
elements
if
For
is
is
set
claim
have
number
contradiction
ourselves
and
technique
on
of
first
large
the
property
the
convenience
If
follows
is
steps
the
a
at
We
they
us
may
the
below
subgraph
is
the
where
first
that
Our
of
following
determined
is
in
the
that
this
we
Note
one
conjecture
and
be
and
increasing
the
that
trivial
of
For
in
with
if
Extremal
Theory
here
The
such
d
uniformly
loosely
edge
of
definitions
and
this
Then
b
connected
and
as
for
in
if
Clearly
Proof
poor
proof
by
obtain
hence
that
functions
all
we
B
given
large
then
lemma
most
and
following
extremal
from
the
not
that
that
the
large
itself
give
for
event
as
a
probability
a
is
larger
Thus
Much
very
cardinality
g
at
a
write
Graph
for
may
at
be
naturally
consider
in
and
Chung
only
that
a
as
left
Ave
the
as
and
its
large
to
vertices
an
given
eorie
trivially
Soc
inspired
investigate
respect
subsets
fixed
chosen
which
of
with
based
to
to
poor
by
otherwise
by
being
see
then
notation
as
that
any
write
belongs
of
we
The
us
the
that
constant
with
vertex
of
in
section
In
constants
of
of
are
that
almost
generate
In
proof
each
at
such
a
Szemer
that
in
Erd
Conjecture
let
all
of
The
in
the
a
we
the
us
let
in
graphs
with
cardinality
generation
suitably
For
it
uczak
that
on
at
Our
that
a
pt
random
general
with
above
of
Haxell
and
notice
neighbourhood
with
with
the
dedicated
Let
a
in
Then
certain
Lemma
given
section
on
we
that
and
constant
with
copies
Matejki
as
most
of
triangles
for
its
prove
by
which
and
this
is
upper
the
condition
and
over
we
now
mention
Probl
the
random
take
such
neighbourhoods
and
too
last
Proof
Estat
to
The
rather
and
a
b
is
Kohayakawa
if
suppose
and
with
from
we
os
the
not
number
below
to
that
Let
definitions
discussed
there
Lemma
regular
generate
seem
Assertion
Lemma
in
For
fact
s
is
letting
of
prove
necessarily
is
vertices
any
given
formed
as
prove
proof
a
selected
if
Mikl
In
distinct
p
In
The
try
graphs
lemma
statement
by
two
essentially
have
spare
we
arbitrary
cf
Suppose
of
the
some
large
probability
odl
triangles
a
Mathematics
random
upper
and
University
for
solely
our
with
graph
For
the
to
at
which
prove
not
connected
is
of
Clearly
not
and
be
be
most
the
well
done
of
satisfies
surely
that
We
by
constant
element
at
and
holds
we
next
as
concerning
was
Pivotal
that
and
results
To
is
spare
previous
Also
two
Thus
quasi
for
depends
are
partite
now
regular
are
have
technical
precise
comments
within
triangles
Then
Let
form
by
while
we
too
of
to
the
to
several
that
only
Thus
to
an
in
induces
next
this
write
and
intersects