\documentstyle[12pt]{article}

\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.4}
\setlength{\textheight}{54pc} 
\setlength{\textwidth}{38pc}  
\setlength{\parindent}{1.4\parindent} 
\setlength{\topmargin}{-16mm}
\addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-1cm} 
\setlength{\footheight}{36pt}  
\setlength{\footskip}{48pt}

%\setlength{\textheight}{200mm}
%\setlength{\textwidth}{160mm}

\newtheorem{prop}{Proposition}[section]
\newtheorem{cor}[prop]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{defi}[prop]{Definition}
\newtheorem{lema}[prop]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{fundlema}[prop]{Fundamental Lemma}
\newtheorem{teo}[prop]{Theorem}

\newcommand{\bea} {\begin{eqnarray*}}
\newcommand{\beq} {\begin{equation}}
\newcommand{\bey} {\begin{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\eea} {\end{eqnarray*}}
\newcommand{\eeq} {\end{equation}}
\newcommand{\eey} {\end{eqnarray}}

\newcommand{\af}{\alpha}
\newcommand{\bt}{\beta}
\newcommand{\dt}{\delta}
\newcommand{\Dt}{\Delta}
\newcommand{\eps}{\epsilon}
\newcommand{\gm}{\gamma}
\newcommand{\Gm}{\Gamma}
\newcommand{\lb}{\lambda}
\newcommand{\Lb}{\Lambda}
\newcommand{\na}{\nabla}
\newcommand{\Om}{\Omega}
\newcommand{\om}{\omega}
\newcommand{\sg}{\sigma}
\newcommand{\ta}{\theta}
\newcommand{\vf}{\varphi}
\newcommand{\vps}{\varepsilon}

\newcommand{\nb}{{\bf n}}

\newcommand{\calc}{{\cal C}}
\newcommand{\calf}{{\cal F}}
\newcommand{\calr}{{\cal R}}

\newcommand{\bs}{\backslash}
\newcommand{\C} {\begin{picture}(8,8)
\put(0,0){\normalsize C}
\put(3.7,0.1){\line(0,1){7}}
\end{picture}}
\newcommand{\coin}{{\rm coin}}
\newcommand{\coker}{{\rm coker}}
\newcommand{\degr}{{\rm deg}}
\newcommand{\dif}{{\rm d}}
\newcommand{\dps}{\displaystyle}
\newcommand{\hbx}{\hfill$\Box$}
\newcommand{\hseis}{\hspace{6mm}}
\newcommand{\intr}{{\rm int}}
\newcommand{\lge}{\langle}
\newcommand{\lra}{\longrightarrow}
\newcommand{\Lt}{\Leftarrow\ }
\newcommand{\nd}{\noindent}
\newcommand{\N}{{\rm I\! N}}
\newcommand{\tr}{{\rm tr}}
\newcommand{\Z}{{\rm Z\!\! Z}}
\newcommand{\ovl}{\overline}
\newcommand{\proof}{\noindent {\bf Proof:\ }}
\newcommand{\vv}{\vspace{4mm}}
\newcommand{\wh}{\widehat}
\newcommand{\wt}{\widetilde}

\title{{\bf Coincidence of maps between surfaces}}

\author{Daciberg L. Gon\c calves\thanks{This work has been supported by
the international cooperation program GMD/Germany-CNPq/Brasil and 
Universidade de S\~ao Paulo during the author 
visit at the Mathematisches Institut der Universit\"at Heidelberg.}}

\date{}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

\vv

\begin{abstract}
We will consider $f, g : S_1 \to S_2$ a pair of maps between two orientable compact surfaces. The purpose of this paper is to study when the pair $(f,g)$ has the property that $(f,g)$ can be deformed to a pair $(f',g')$ such that 
$\#\coin(f'g') = N(f,g)$ the Nielsen coincidence number of $(f,g)$. We
derive an equivalent algebraic condition and show that if we compose $(f,g)$
with certain maps $h : S \to S_1$ then the question has a positive
answer. Finally we analize the case of roots i.e. $g$ is the constant map.
When $S_2$ is the torus we give a new proof of the converse of the Lefschetz
theorem for coincidence.

\vv

AMS Subject Classification:

Primary: 55M20 \qquad Secondary: 55M25 \quad 57N75

\vv

{\bf Running title:} Coincidence on surfaces.

\end{abstract}

\normalsize
\baselineskip=8.5mm

\nd {\bf Introduction:}
The purpose of this work is to study the Wecken problem for coincidence.
Namely, given $f,g : S_1 \to S_2$, two continuous maps, when does it exist
$f'$ homotopic to $f$, $g'$ homotopic to $g$ such that $\#\coin(f',g') = 
N(f,g)$ (where $\#$ stands for cardinality and $coin(f,g)=\{x \in S_1 | f(x)=g(x)\}$. This question even for fixed points is known to have a positive
answer for some pairs ($id, f$) and negative answer for others. See for
example [J$1$] and [J$2$]. Let us say that $(f,g)$ has the Wecken property
if the question above has a positive answer. In section 1 we derive 
algebraic conditions, in terms of the Braid groups, for a pair $(f,g)$
to have the Wecken property. This is the Fundamental Lemma 1.2. We also prove Theorem 1.3 which says: {\it Given any pair of maps $(f,g) : S_l \to S_h$ between two surfaces,  there
is an integer $n$ such that $(f \circ p_{l,n}, g\circ p_{l,n})$
has the Wecken property. Also $N(f\circ p_{l,n}, g\circ p_{l,n}) = 
N(f,g)$, for any integer $n$.}
Here $p_{l,n}$ looks like a projection. 
In section 2 we specialize to the case where 
the second space is the torus T. We reduce the problem  where 
one of the maps is the constant map. Then we write the algebraic
equations which are equivalent to the geometric problem. These are 
propositions 2.1 and 2.3 respectively. Finally we give a proof of
the converse to the Lefschetz theorem for 
coincidence of maps on the torus. This is Theorem 2.8 which says: {\it Given $f, g : S \to T$ such that $N(f,g) = 0$ then $(f,g)$ can be deformed
to be a pair $(f',g')$ which is coincidence free.}
This theorem relies on the fact that a map $h : S \to T$, which has degree zero,
can be deformed to a map which is not surjective. This result is known, but we give a new proof, that we expect to have its own interest.

We would like to thank Prof. E. Fadell for many helpful 
conversations, for his interesting questions about the subject and for his
encouragement. Finally, we would like to thank Prof. R.F. Brown for pointing out
the overlapping of this work with others and his suggestions, which improved
the exposition of this work.

\section{Algebraic version of the Wecken property and further results}

We will start with a Fundamental Lemma, which is a natural generalization of Theorem 1.1 of [J$3$] for coincidence; the proof basically
follows the same kind of arguments therein. 


Let $S_l,S_h$ be the orientable compact surfaces of genus $l,h$ respectively, and ${e_1,...e_{2l}}$ a fixed basis of  $\pi_1(S_l,x_0)$. Let us assume that
the chosen basis satisfies the relation $\prod_{i=1}^l
[e_{2i - 1}, e_{2i}]=[T]$, where $[T]$ is the element defined in [J$3$], page 125. Suppose we are given two maps $f, g : S_l \to S_h$, where we have $f_{\#}(e_i)
= w_i$, $g_{\#}(e_i) = v_i$, $i = 1, 2, \ldots, 2l$, and $w_i,v_i$ belong to $\pi_1(S_h,y_1),\pi_1(S_h,y_2)$ respectively and $f(x_0)=y_1 \ne y_2=g(x_0)$. Following [FH$1$] section 4, we have two subgroups of $\pi_1(S_h \times S_h - \Dt,(y_1,y_2))$ generated by  $(\rho_{1,1}$, $\rho_{2,1}$, 
$\ldots$, $\rho_{2h-1, 1}$, $\rho_{2h, 1})$, $(\rho_{1,2}$, $\rho_{2,2}$, 
$\ldots$, $\rho_{2h-1, 2}$, $\rho_{2h,2})$, which we denote by $F_1,F_2$ respectively. Let
$W_i$, $V_i$ be elements of $F_1,F_2$  which 
project over $w_i$, $v_i$ respectively under
the map $\pi_1(S_h \times S_h - \Dt,(y_1,y_2)) \to \pi_1(S_h\times S_h,(y_1,y_2))$ induced by
the inclusion. Let $N(f,g) = r$ and $k_1, \ldots, k_r$ be the indices of the 
essential Nielsen classes. Also, let $\{1, \af_2, \ldots, \af_r\}$ be a set
of representatives of the Reidemeister classes of $(f,g)$, which corresponds
to the essential Nielsen classes. Let the class defined by $\af_i$ have
index $k_i$ and the class defined by 1 have index $k_1$. (For the definition of the local coincidence index, see e.g. [V]). We choose a base point
in the class defined by $1$.

\begin{defi} A pair $(f,g)$ has the Wecken property if we can find $f'$
homotopic to $f$, $g'$ homotopic to $g$ such that $\#\coin(f',g') = N(f,g)$.
\end{defi}

Now let $F = \pi_1(S_h - y_1,y_2)$, $N = {\rm Ker}(F \to \pi_1(S_h,y_2))$, 
$B = \prod_{i=1}^h
[\rho_{2i - 1,2}, \rho_{2i, 2}^-1]$ and $B_\af = \af B\af^{-1}$ as in
[FH$1$].
\begin{fundlema}
The pair $(f,g)$ satisfies the Wecken property if and only if 
\begin{itemize}
\item[(a)] If $N(f,g) = 0$ then we can find a solution $\ta_i \in N$,
$i = 1, 2, \ldots, 2g$ of the equation
\[\prod_{i=1}^g [\ta_{2i- 1}W_{2i-1}V_{2i-1}, \ta_{2i}W_{2i}V_{2i}] = 1\ .\]
\item[(b)] If $N(f,g) = r \ne 0$ and $k_1, \ldots, k_r$ are the indices
of the Nielsen classes, then we can find a solution $\ta_i \in N$, 
$i = 1, \ldots, 2g$ of the equation
\[\prod_{i=1}^g [\ta_{2i- 1}W_{2i-1}V_{2i-1}, \ta_{2i}W_{2i}V_{2i}] = 
B^{k_1}B_{\af_2}^{k_2} \cdots B_{\af_r}^{k_r}\]
for some set $\{1, \af_2, \ldots, \af_r\}$ of representatives of the
correspondents essential Nielsen classes.
\end{itemize}
\end{fundlema}

\proof 
The case (a) can be proved in the same way as case (b) and it is simpler.
So we will show only case (b). Suppose $(f,g)$ satisfies the Wecken
property. Let $f' \sim f$, $g' \sim g$, where $\sim$ means homotopic,
such that $\#\coin(f',g') = N(f,g)$. Denote by $x_1, \ldots, x_r$ the points
of $\coin(f',g')$. Around each point we draw a small circle and connect
them by a path. See picture below.

 \vspace{11cm}

Using the notation of the picture above, the small circle around the point 
$x_j$ is
$\lb_j *\bt_j^{-1}$. The base point is $x_0$ which belongs to the circle
around the first point. Two consecutive circles are connected by a path
$\gm_j$. Call $D_j$ the closed disk which boundary the circle around $x_j$
and $\stackrel{\circ}{D}_j$ its interior. Since $(f',g')$ have no coincidence
in $S_g - \bigcup_{j=1}^r\stackrel{\circ}{D}_j$, this means that $(f',g')$
is in fact a map $(f',g') : S_g - \bigcup_{j=1}^r\stackrel{\circ}{D}_j
\to S_n \times S_n - \Dt$. But the loop $\xi = \prod_{i=1}^g[\rho_{2i - 1},
\rho_{2i}]\prod_{i=1}^r\xi_i$ is trivial in $S_g - \bigcup_{j=1}^r
\stackrel{\circ}{D}_j$ where $\xi_i$ is the class of the loop 
\[\lb_1 * \gm_1 * \cdots * \lb_{i-1}*\gm_{i-1}*\bt_i*\lb_i^{-1}*\gm_{i-1}^{-1}
*\lb_{i-1}^{-1}*\cdots *\gm_1^{-1}*\lb_1^{-1}\ .\]
So $(f \times g)_{\#}(\xi)$ is 1 in $\pi_1(S_n \times S_n - \Dt)$. Let 
$\vf_i$ be the path $\lb_1*\gm_1 * \cdots * \lb_{i-1}*\gm_{i-1}$  which goes from
the base point $x_0$ to the base point of the circle around $x_i$. Since the
coincidence index of $x_i$ is $k_i$ we have that $(f'(\vf_i * \lb_i * 
\bt_i^{-1}* \vf_i^{-1})$, $g'(\vf_i * \lb_i * \bt_i^{-1} * \vf_i^{-1}))$ 
as a Braid
represents the class of $\af_iB^{k_i}\af_i^{-1}\approx B_{\af_i}^{k_i}$
where $\af_i \approx g(\wt\vf_i)f(\wt\vf_i)^{-1}$ and $\wt\vf_i$ is just
$\vf_i$ followed by the radius from the end of $\vf_i$ to $x_i$. Also
$(f'(\rho_i), g'(\rho_i))$ as a braid is $\ta_iW_iV_i$ for some $\ta_i
\in N$. So it follows from $(f\times g)_{\#}(\xi) = 1$ the equation given in
part (b).

Now suppose that we have a solution for the equation given in (b). Let us
define two functions $f, g : S_g \to S_h$.

Using the same picture and notation as above define $f(x) = y_0$ for
$x \in D_1 \cup \gm_1 \cup
D_2 \cup \cdots \cup \gm_{r-1} \cup D_r$, where $y_0$ is a fixed point
of $S_h$. Define $g$ on the boundary of $D_i$ s.t. the image is a small
circle around $y_0$ and $g$ has degree $k_i$. Extend $g$ to $D_i$
radially and define $g$ on the path $\gm_i$ in such way that $g(\wt\vf)$
represents the element $\af_i$ given by the equation. Finally on the 
edges $\gm$, $\rho_i$ define $f$ and $g$ such that $f(e_i)$,
$g(e_i)$ represent the words $w_i$, $v_i$ respectively. There is no
problem to define $f, g$ in these edges without having coincidence.
But the given equation is precisely the algebraic condition to extend
the map $\vf = (f,g)$ over the 2-skeleton. See theorem 4.3.1 of [B].

If $\wt\vf$ is the extension and $p_i : S_h \times S_h - \Dt \to S_h$ is 
the projection on the $i$-th coordinate, then the maps $f_1 = p_1
\circ\wt\vf$, $g_1 = p_2\circ\wt\vf$ are certainly homotopic to $f$, $g$
respectively and we get the result. \hbx


\vv

This type of equation is basically the same one which appears in [J3],
theorem 1.1 where they treat the fixed point case.



\vv

Let $S_l$ be the orientable surface of genus $l$. Define $p_{l,n} : 
S_{l+n} \to S_l$ as the map which takes the last $n$-handles  to 
a point $p$, while the complement is mapped almost like the identity
(see picture below)\\



\vspace*{14cm}

Now we will state the main result of this section. For its proof we need Proposition 1.4.

\begin{teo}
Given any pair of maps $(f,g) : S_l \to S_h$ among two surfaces,  there
is an integer $n$ such that $(f \circ p_{l,n}, g\circ p_{l,n})$
has the Wecken property. Also $N(f\circ p_{l,n}, g\circ p_{l,n}) = 
N(f,g)$ for any integer $n$.
\end{teo}

Now let us consider the abelianized obstruction, (see [FH$1$]), to lift a map
to the 2-skeleton. If we consider the diagram
\[\begin{array}{ccccc}
&&&& S_h \times S_h - \Dt \\
&&&& \\
&&&& \downarrow \\
&&&& \\
(f,g): S_l && \lra && S_h\times S_h
\end{array}\]
by [FH$1$] the abelianized obstruction to lift $(f,g)$ from the 1-skeleton
to the 2-skeleton is an element of $H^2(S_l, Z[\pi])$, where 
$\pi = \pi_1(S_h)$. This cohomology class can be represented by a
2-cocycle of the form $\sum n_i[\af_i]$ where $n_i$ is the index of a
Nielsen class and $[\af_i]$ is the corresponding Reidemeister class.

\begin{prop}
We can find $\ta_1, \ldots, \ta_{2l} \in N$ which are a solution for the
equation given in part (b) of the fundamental lemma 1.2, on $N_{ab}$ i.e. 
the abelianized of $N$.
\end{prop}

\proof
By classical obstruction theory, if a 2-cocycle  represents an obstruction
class which is a two dimensional cohomology class, then we can deform
the function over the 1-skeleton such that the cocycle defined from
this new function is precisely the one given. This new function together
with the original one provide us with $\ta_1, \ldots, \ta_{2l}$ which
is a solution for the equation in part (b) on $N_{ab}$.  \hbx

\vv

\nd {\bf Remark:} This can be done directly working with $N_{ab} \cong
Z[\pi]$.

\vv

\nd {\bf Proof of theorem 1.3:} By propostion 1.4 if we are given a set of
representatives $\{1, \af_2$, $\ldots$, $\af_r\}$ of the Reidemeister classes
which correspond to the essential Nielsen classes, we can find $\ta_1, 
\ldots, \ta_{2l}$ such that 
\[W = B_{\af_k}^{-n_k} \cdots B_{\af_2}^{-n_2}B^{-n_1}[\ta_1W_1V_1, \ta_2W_2
V_2]\cdots [\ta_{2l-1}W_{2l-1}V_{2l-1}, \ta_{2l}W_{2l}V_{2l}] \in [N, N]\]
or this element is zero in $N_{ab}$. So we have $\ta_{2l+1}, \ldots,
\ta_{2l+2n} \in N$ such that
\[W = \prod_{j=1}^n[\ta_{2l + 2n - 2j + 2}, \ta_{2l + 2n - 2j + 1}]\qquad
\hbox{or}\]
\beq
\prod_{i=1}^l[\ta_{2i-1}W_{2i-1}V_{2i-1}, \ta_{2i}W_{2i}V_{2i}]
\prod_{j=l+1}^{l+n}
[\ta_{2j-1}, \ta_{2j}] = B^{n_1}B_{\af_2}^{n_2} \cdots B_{\af_k}^{n_k}\ .
\eeq
Now we  have
\[f\circ p_{l,n}(e_i) = \cases{f_{\#}(e_i) , \ 1 \le i \le 2l \cr
1 , \ 2l + 1 \le i \le 2(l+n) \cr} \quad\hbox{and}\quad g\circ p_{l,n}(e_i)
= \cases{g_{\#}(e_i), \ 1 \le i \le 2l \cr 1 , \ 2l + 1 \le i \le 2(l+n) 
\cr}\]
So by the Fundamental Lemma 1.2, equation (1) above implies that 
$(f\circ p_{l,n}, g \circ p_{l,n})$ has the Wecken property.

Finally, we can assume that the point $p$ which appears in the definition of
the function $p_{l,n}$, does not belong to $\coin (f,g)$. So $\coin(f\circ
p_{l,n}, g\circ p_{l,n}) \stackrel{p_{l,n}}{\longrightarrow} \coin (f,g)$
is an homeomorphism, which induces a map among the Nielsen classes. This
induced map is certainly surjective and is also injective because $p_{l,n\#}
(\pi_1(S_{l+n}) \to \pi_1(S_l))$ is surjective. So we have a bijection among
the Nielsen classes and the corresponding classes certainly have the
same index. So the result follows.  \hbx

\vv

\nd {\bf Remark:} The result above suggests the natural question which is to
find the minimum integer $n$ such that $(f\circ p_{n,l}, g\circ p_{n,l})$
has the Wecken property. In a reasonable number of cases, the answer is known
mainly when  one of the maps is the identity. See e.g. [J$1$].

\vv

To finish this section, we prove   a proposition which tells us that, in 
order to minimize coin, it suffices to change one function, at least when 
the target space is a manifold. This geometric fact is useful.

Let $f, g : M \to N$ be two continuous maps where $M$ is a topological space, and $N$ is a manifold. Let $\mu(f, g) = \min\limits_{f'\in [f], g' \in [g]}
\#\coin(f',g')$ and $\mu_1(f,g) = \min\limits_{g'\in [g]} \# \coin (f,g')$.

\begin{prop}
For any pair $(f,g) : M \to N$ we have $\mu(f,g) = \mu_1(f,g)$.
\end{prop}

\proof Consider the fibered pair $(N \times N, N\times N - \Dt)
\stackrel{p_1}{\lra} N$ (see [F]), where $p_1$ is the projection on the
first coordinate. Certainly we have $\mu(f,g) \le \mu_1(f,g)$. So it
suffices to show that $\mu_1(f,g) \le \mu(f,g)$. For this let $(f',g')$
such that $\#\coin(f',g') = k$. We have that $\ovl f, \ovl f' : M \times M \to N$
are homotopic where $\ovl f(x,y) = f(x)$ and $\ovl f'(x,y) = f'(x)$. 
Call $H$ such homotopy. The map $f'$ has a lift, namely
$(f',g')$ such that $(f',g')(M - \coin(f',g')) \subset N \times N - \Dt$.
By the lifting property of fibered pairs it follows that there is a lift
$\wt H$ of $H$ such that $\wt H(M - \coin(f',g')) \subset N \times N - \Dt$.
So $\wt H(\ , 1) = (f,g'')$ and $\coin(f,g'') \subset \coin(f',g')$. 
Therefore $\#\coin(f,g'') \le \#\coin(f',g')$ and the result follows. \hbx

\vv

Although known in a more general form, we decided to include the above proof since it is  simpler than the one appearing in [Br]. 

\vv

\section{Root case and coincidence of maps into the torus}

Let $S$ be an orientable surface, $T$ the torus and $f,g : S \to T$ two
maps. Now, if we identify $T$ with $S^1 \times S^1$, then $T$ has a group structure given by the complex multiplication in each coordinate. So we  consider the maps $h(x) = g(x)/f(x)$
and $c(x) = e$, where $e \in T$ is the identity element with respect to
the above multiplication.

\begin{prop} 
We have $\coin(f,g) = \coin(h,c)$ and $N(f,g) = N(h,c)$. Further $(f,g)$ has 
the Wecken property if and only if we can find a map $h_1$ homotopic to 
$h$ such that $\# h_1^{-1}(1) = N(f,g)$.
\end{prop}

\proof
It is clear that $\#\coin(f,g) = \#\coin(h,c)$. Also, the Nielsen classes of 
$(f,g)$ and $(h,c)$ are the same. For let $x, y \in \coin(f,g)$, 
$\lb : I \to S$, $\lb(0) = x$, $\lb(1) = y$ with $f(\lb) \sim g(\lb)$ 
relative to the end points and let
$H$ be a homotopy. Then $H_1(s, t) = H(s,t)/f(\lb(s))$ gives a homotopy
relative to the end points between $h(\lb)$ and $c(\lb)$. To see that a 
class has the same index with respect to both pair of maps, let us 
consider the map $\psi : (T \times T, T\times T - \Dt) \to (T, T - \{1\})$
given by $\psi(x,y) = y/x$. This is a well defined map of the pairs and
$\psi^* : H^n(T, T - \{1\}) \to H^n(T \times T, T\times T - \Dt)$ takes
the fundamental cohomology class to the Thom class. But $\psi \circ (f,g)
= \psi \circ (h,c)$. So a Nielsen class has the same index either with 
respect to $(f,g)$ or $(h,c)$. 

Finally, by Proposition 1.5, in order to minimize coincidence, it suffices
to deform one of the maps, let us say $h$, so the result follows. \hbx

\vv

From now on let $h : S \to T$ be a map and let $h_{\#} : H_1(S) \to H_1(T)$
be given by $h_{\#} = \left(\begin{array}{ccccc}
a_1 & b_1 & \cdots & a_g & b_g \\ c_1 & d_1 & \cdots & c_g & d_g 
\end{array}\right)$, where $S$ is a compact surface of genus $g$. Let $\Lb(h,c)$ be the Lefschetz coincidence number
and $\deg(h)$ the degree of $h$.

\begin{prop}
We have $\Lb(h,c) = \degr(h)$. If $\degr(h) = 0$ then $N(h,c) = 0$. If 
$\degr(h) \ne 0$ then $N(h,c) = \#\coker(h_{\#})$ and each Nielsen class
has index equal to $\degr(h)$ divided by $N(h,c)$.
\end{prop}

\proof
The above result is true in general, i.e. whenever $S$ and $T$ are  orientable
manifolds of the same dimension. This follows from Proposition 5 of [L] and
Corollary 7.3 of [K], or [O1].  \hbx

\vv

Now we will derive the algebraic condition for $(h,c)$ to have the Wecken
property. When $\degr(h)$ is not zero, then we certainly have that 
$h_{\#}(\pi_1(S)) \lhd \pi_1(T)$ has a finite index. Denote by $\{\af_1, \ldots, 
\af_n\}$ a set of representatives of the elements of the Reidemeister classes 
$\pi_1(T)/h_{\#}(\pi_1(S))$. Let us pick a base point $x_0$ for $S$ and $y_0$ 
for $T$ where $y_0$ is close to $1 \in T$. Denote by $j : T - \{1\} 
\hookrightarrow T$ the inclusion, by  $F(x,y) = \pi_1(T - \{1\})$ the free 
group on two generators and $B_\af = \af B\af^{- 1}$, $w_{2i - 1} = 
x^{a_i}y^{b_i}$, $w_{2i} = x^{c_i}y^{d_i}$.  As before let 
$B = [x, y]$, $N = [F, F]$ and $h_{\#} = \left(\begin{array}{ccccc}
a_1 & b_1 & \cdots & a_g & b_g \\ c_1 & d_1 & \cdots & c_g & d_g 
\end{array}\right)$.

\begin{prop}
Let $h : S \to T$. Then there exists $h_1 \sim h$ such that $\#h_1^{-1}(1) 
= N(h,c)$ iff
\begin{itemize}
\item[(a)] If $\degr(h) = 0$ then the equation 
\[\prod_{i=1}^g[\ta_{2i-1}w_{2i-1},\ta_{2i}w_{2i}] = 1\]
has a solution $\ta_i \in N = [F, F]$, $i = 1, \ldots 2g$.
\item[(b)] If $\degr(h) = m \ne 0$, let $r = \#\coker(h_{\#})$ and $k = m/r$.
Then the equation
\[\prod_{i=1}^g[\ta_{2i-1}w_{2i-1}, \ta_{2i}w_{2i}] = B^k.B_{\af_2}^k 
\cdots B_{\af_r}^k\]
has a solution for some $\ta_j \in N$ and for some set of representatives
$\{1, \af_2, \ldots, \af_r\}$ of the quotient ${\pi_1(T) \over h_{\#}
(\pi_1(S))}$.
\end{itemize}
\end{prop}

\proof
The proof follows from the Fundamental Lemma 1.2. It is enough to see that because the second map is the constant map, then the equation given in part b) of the Fundamental Lemma 1.2 is in fact an equation in the subgroup $F_1$, where $F_1$ is defined before definition 1.1. So the result follows.  \hbx

\vv

In the special case where $N(f,g) = 0$, we will show, in a geometric way, that
$(f,g)$ satisfies the Wecken property.

\begin{lema}
In order to show that a pair with $N(h,c) = 0$, has the Wecken property, it
suffices to consider the case where $h_{\#}(\pi_1(S)) = \pi_1(T)$.
\end{lema}

\proof
If the ${\rm rank}(h_{\#}(\pi_1(S))) < 2$ then we can deform $h$ to $h_1$ such
that $h_1(S)$ lies inside  a curve which does not contain $1 \in T$. If 
$h_{\#}(\pi_1(S))$ has rank two, take $\wt T \stackrel{p}{\longrightarrow} T$
the finite cover which corresponds to the subgroup $h_{\#}(\pi_1(S))$ and 
let $\wt h : S
\to \wt T$ be the lifting of $h$. So $\wt h : S \to \wt T$ has the property
that $\wt h_{\#} : \pi_1(S) \+to \pi_1(\wt T)$ is surjective. If $\wt h$
can be deformed to a map which is not surjective, then it can be deformed
to the one skeleton of $\wt T$ which we can assume that does not intersect
$p^{-1}(1)$, where $p : \wt T \to T$ is the cover map. So the result 
follows. \hbx

\vv

Let $\gm \subset S_g$ be an embedded curve. We let $h_\gm : S_g \to
S^1$ be a map defined as follows: take a tubular neighbourhood of $\gm$
and let $\vf : \gm \times [-\vps, \vps] \to S_g$ be an homeomorphism onto
that tubular neighborhood of $\gm$. Now we define
\[h_\gm(x) = \cases{e^{\pi ti \over \vps} &if $x = \vf(x_1, t)$ \cr
-1 &otherwise. \cr}\]

Roughly speaking, the homology class represented by $\gm$  is the Poincar\'e
dual of the cohomology class $h_{\gm}^{\#}(w_1) \in H^1(S_g)$ with proper 
orientations, where $w_1$ is a choosen generator of $H^1(S^1)$. See [G], 
Part II and [T] for more details.

Let $h : S_g \to T$ and
\[h_{\#} = \left(\begin{array}{ccccccc}
a_1 & b_1 & a_2 & b_2 & \cdots & a_g & b_g \\
c_1 & d_1 & c_2 & d_2 & \cdots & c_g & d_g \end{array}\right)\ .\]
We will assume from now on that ${\rm deg}\,h = \Lb(h,c) = 0$ and $h_\#(\pi_1
(S)) = \pi_1(T)$.

\begin{prop}
The elements $(a_1, b_1, \ldots, a_g, b_g)$ and $(c_1, d_1, \ldots, c_g,
d_g)$ in $\underbrace{\Z \oplus \cdots \oplus \Z}_{2g}$ are indivisible.
\end{prop}

\proof
This follows from the fact that $h_\#(\pi_1(S)) = \pi_1(T)$. \hbx

\vv

Let $\gm_1$ resp. $\gm_2$ be two  connected closed simple curves which represent
the homology classes $(a_1, b_1, \ldots, a_g, b_g)$ resp. $(c_1, d_1, \ldots,
c_g, d_g)$. Such curves do exist. See e.g. [G] or [ZVC] section 
3.6. We can assume that these two curves intersect transversally.

\begin{prop}
The intersection number of these two curves is zero.
\end{prop}

\proof
See [D], chapter VIII, 13 or [ZVC] section 3.6. \hbx

\vv

Now we will modify one of the curves, $\gm_1$ for example, such that the new
curve $\gm_1'$ has the following properties: a) $\gm_1'$ is a simple curve, not 
necessarily connected; b) $\gm_1'$ represents the same homology class 
as $\gm_1$; c) $\gm_1' \cap \gm_2 = \emptyset$.

\begin{prop}
Given $\gm_1$ and $\gm_2$ we can construct $\gm_1'$ as above.
\end{prop}

\proof 
The argument how to construct $\gm_1'$ is contained in [G], appendix. The 
picture below gives the idea of the construction. Namely, for each two 
consecutive points with intersection number $+1$ and $-1$ we get a
new curve as shown below.

\newpage

\vspace*{10cm}

Since the number of points in the intersection is finite the process
ends after a finite number of steps and we get the curve $\gm_1'$ with
the required properties. \hbx

\begin{teo}
Given $f, g : S \to T$ such that $N(f,g) = 0$ then $(f,g)$ can be deformed
to  a pair $(f',g')$ which is coincidence free.
\end{teo}

\proof 
It suffices to consider the map $h(x) = g(x)/f(x)$ and to
show that $h$ can be deformed to $h'$ such that $1 \not\in h'(S)$. We can
also assume, by lemma 2.4, that $h_\#(\pi_1(S)) = \pi_1(T)$. Let $\gm_1'$ 
and $\gm_2$
be the two curves given by proposition 2.7. So we have two maps $h_{\gm_1'}$,
$h_{\gm_2} : S \to S^1$. Therefore we have $h_1 = (h_{\gm_1'}, h_{\gm_2})
: S \to T$. Certainly 
\[h_1^{-1}(1) = h_{\gm_1'}^{-1}(1) \cap h_{\gm_2}^{-1}(1) = \gm_1' \cap
\gm_2 = \emptyset \]

So $h_1^{-1}(1) = \emptyset$ and $h_1$ is certainly homotopic to $h$ because
they induce the same homomorphism on $\pi_1$ or $H_1$. Therefore the result 
follows.  \hbx

\vv

\nd {\bf Comments on the general case of degree zero 1:} Given a map $h : S_1 \to S_2$ 
between any two compact orientable surfaces,
it is known that if $\degr(h) = 0$, then $h$ can be deformed to a map
which is not surjective. This is a consequence of deep results of Kneser, 
as it was pointed out in [E]. For this purpose you can also see [K$1$], [K$2$]
and [ZVC] section 3.3. This, in particular, shows by means of the Fundamental
Lemma 2.1, that certain quadratic equations on free group have solutions. It is
not clear how to explictly provide a solution or even how 
to show algebraically, that such equations have a solution.


\vv

\nd {\bf Comment on our result 2:} Theorem 2.8 certainly is not new.
In fact it is weaker than the results pointed out above. Nevertheless, we
believe that the proof given of Theorem 2.8 may have its own interest.

\vv

\nd {\bf Comment on the case general case 3:} In general, one can not expect
to have $(h,c)$ to satisfying the Wecken property. The first example of a map $h : S_2 \to T$ $S_2$=the surface of genus $2$ where $(h,c)$
does not satisfy the Wecken property, was given in [L]. This naturally brings up the question of trying
to classify the maps $h$ such that $(h,c)$ satisfies the Wecken property. 
More has been done recently about this question in a joint work in preparation.

\vv {\bf General comment 4:} The connection between geometry and algebra given
by the Fundamental Lemma, sounds promissing for both areas.


\section*{References}

\parindent=0pt
\baselineskip=5mm

\begin{description}
\item{[B] Baues, H.J.}\ \ Obstruction theory. \ \ {\it Lectures Notes
in Mathematics} {\bf 628}, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1977.
\item{[Br] Brook, R.B.S.}\ \ On removing coincidences of two maps when
only one, rather than both of them, may be deformed by a homotopy.
\ \ {\it Pacific Journal of Mathematics}, {\bf 40}, n.1, 45--52.
\item{[D] Dold, A.}\ \ Lectures on algebraic topology.\ \ {\it Grundlehren
der Mathematischen Wissenschaften} {\bf 200}. Springer-Verlag, 
Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1972.
\item{[E] Epstein, D.B.A.}\ \ The degree of a map.\ \ {\it Proceedings
of the London Mathematical Society}{\bf (3)16}, 369--383 (1966).
\item{[F] Fadell, E.}\ \ Generalized normal bundles for locally-flat
imbeddings. \ \ {\it Trans. Am. Math. Soc.} {\bf 114}, 488--513 (1965).
\item{[FH1] Fadell, E.} and Husseini, S.\ \ The Nielsen number on surfaces.
\ \ {\it Contemporary Mathematics} {\bf 21}, Topological methods in non linear 
functional analysis 59--99 (1982).
\item{[FH2] Fadell, E.} and Husseini, S.\ \ Fixed point theory for
non simply connected manifolds.\ \ {\it Topology} {\bf 20}, 53--93 (1981).
\item{[G] Gon\c calves, D.L.}\ \ Fixed points of $S^1$-fibrations.\ \ 
{\it Pacific Journal of Mathematics} {\bf 129(12)}, 297--306 (1987).
\item{[J1] Jiang, B.}\ \ The fixed point classes from the differential
view point.\ \ {\it Lectures Notes in Math.} {\bf 886}. Fixed point theory,
163--170 (1981).
\item{[J2] Jiang, B.}\ \ Fixed points and braids II. \ \ {\it Math. Ann.},
272, 249--256 (1985).
\item{[J3] Jiang, B.}\ \ Surface maps and braid equations, I.\ \ 
{\it Lecture Notes in Math.}, {\bf 1369}, 125--141.
\item{[K] Kiang, T.H.}\ \ The theory of fixed point classes.\ \ Springer-Verlag
1989.
\item{[K1] Kneser, H.}\ \ Gl\"attung von Fl\"achenabbildungen.\ \ 
{\it Math. Ann.} {\bf 100}, 609--617 (1928).
\item{[K2] Kneser, H.}\ \ Die Kleinste Bedeckungszahlinnerhalb
einer Klasse von Fl\"a\-chen\-abbil\-dun\-gen.\ \ {\it Math. Ann.} {\bf 103},
347--358 (1930).
\item{[L] Lin, X.}\ \ On the  root classes of mapping.\ \ {\it Acta
Math. Sinica}, {\bf 2}, 199--206 (1986).
\item{[O1] Oliveira, E.} \ \ { Teoria de Nielsen para coincid\^encia e
algumas aplica\c c\~oes}.\ \ Ph.D. Thesis.
\item{[T] Thom, R.} \ \ Quelques propri\'et\'es globales des vari\'et\'es
differentiables.\ \ {\it Comm. Math. Helv.} {\bf 28}, 17--86 (1954).
\item{[V] Vick, J.}\ \  Homology theory.\ \ {\it Academic Press}, New York,
1976.
\item{[ZVC] Zieschang, H.}, Vogt, E., Coldewey, H.D.\ \ Surfaces and 
planes discontinuous groups. \ \ {\it Lectures Notes in Mathematics} {\bf 835}. 
Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1980.
\end{description}

\vv\vv

\begin{center}
Daciberg Lima Gon\c calves

Departamento de Matem\'atica - IME-USP

Caixa Postal 66.281 - Ag. Cidade de S\~ao Paulo

05315-970 - S\~ao Paulo - SP - Brasil

E-mail: DLGONCAL@IME.USP.BR

\end{center}

\end{document}


% PARTE QUE FOI ELIMINADA NA PENULTIMA VERSAO: PROPOSICAO 2.9 E TEOREMA 2.10

\begin{prop}
Given $\gm_1$ and $\gm_2$ we can construct $\gm_1$ as above.
\end{prop}

\proof 
The argument for construct $Y_1'$ is contained in [G], appendix. The 
picture below gives the idea of the construction. Namely for each two 
consecutives points with intersection number $+1$ and $-1$ we get

\vspace{5cm}

\hbx

\begin{teo}
Given $f, g : S \to T$ such that $N(f,g) = 0$ then $(f,g)$ can be deformed
to be a pair $(f',g')$ which is coincidence free.
\end{teo}

\proof 
It suffices to consider the map $h(x) = g(x)/f(x)$ and to
show that $h$ can be deformed to $h'$ such that $1 \not\in h'(S)$. We can
also assume that $h_\#(\pi_1(S)) = \pi_1(T)$. Let $\gm_1'$ and $\gm_2$
be the two curves given by proposition 2.7. So we have two maps $h_{\gm_1'}$,
$h_{\gm_2} : S \to S^1$. Therefore we have $h' = (h_{\gm_1'}, h_{\gm_2})
: S \to T$. Certainly 
\[h^{'-1}(1) = h_{\gm_1'}^{-1}(1) \cap h_{\gm_2}^{-1}(1) = \gm_1' \cap
\gm_2 = \emptyset\ .\]

